THANKS to everyone for making it along to this emergency meeting at such short notice – and may I extend a particular welcome to our colleagues from the Marmalade Marketing Board.

It’s so important for us to work together to keep preserves high on the policy agenda.

They say all publicity is good publicity, but we’re facing a challenge here. On the one hand, great news: everyone is talking about jam. This is the week we’ve been waiting for ever since we established our network four decades ago. On the other hand, no-one is talking about the sweet, simple joy of a jam sandwich, the ecstasy of jam on sourdough toast or the illicit thrill of jam straight from the jar at 11pm on a Tuesday night. Instead they are talking about mouldy jam. Contaminated jam. Bad batches of jam that could land addicts in hospital. This will not do.

READ MORE: Experts urge Theresa May to kick her mouldy jam habit

We have worked tirelessly to take back control of the definition of jam. Our efforts have succeeded beyond our wildest expectations. When we began our covert campaign against Council Directive 79/693/EEC back in 1979, few would have predicted that we would be successful not only in protecting the integrity of the fruit-based preserves market but in removing the UK from the EU altogether.

It has been a long, difficult and sticky road, but our goal is within reach. One final push will ensure that across the nations of the UK, fruit means fruit and jam means jam. Post-Brexit, my friends, there will be no “carrot jam”. There will be no “pumpkin jam”. There will – please hold your applause – THERE WILL BE NO “CUCUMBER JAM”!

Rhubarb jam will of course still be allowed, because it is absolutely delicious. Tomato jam will not, because everyone knows that “tomatoes are a fruit” is one of the many lies cooked up by unelected Brussels bureaucrats, who would probably try to claim a jar of mashed Brussels sprouts was “jam” given half a chance.

The honey threat, too, has been significantly reduced thanks to our targeted campaign of bee murder and our successful efforts to blame the resulting population decline on pesticides and climate change. Our membership has also had great success in getting anti-bee propaganda published in the letters pages of national newspapers. Particular credit must go to raspberry farmer Derek Sugarman, who successfully bribed a jam-dependent tabloid reporter into running the news stories “Bee sting drama shuts down hospice fundraiser” and “Honey I poisoned the kids”.

Now, however, we must turn our attention to an equally pressing problem – the pernicious falsehood that jam is “unhealthy”, “full of sugar” and should be consumed only “in moderation”.

We’ve seen jam disappear from school dining rooms and hospital canteens, and the jam industry hit hard by a sugar tax.

It is no exaggeration to state that there a war is being waged against jam. We must rally our troops to defend all that is sweet, fruity and neither liquid nor solid.

This week’s flurry of publicity has demonstrated that we still have jam-lovers in high places, but what we really need are “influencers” – people who are respected, admitted and listened to rather than pitied, despised and ignored.

We need glamorous social media stars willing to take baths of jam wearing thong bikinis, not penny-pinching politicians who are too weak to screw jar lids on properly. We need YouTube videos of hyped-up, apple-cheeked toddlers chuckling adorably as they are spoon-fed jam – NB not puree – by parents rapping about the vitamins in fruit to beats by Jam Master Jay.

READ MORE: Exclusive: We reveal the special place in hell reserved for Brexiteers

Going forward we must pursue a two-pronged strategy of inserting subliminal messages about the joys of jam into the mainstream media and pushing jam to new markets such as young people in nightclubs, stressed executives and elite athletes seeking a competitive edge.

We must flood the food banks with gateway jams such as strawberry and apricot, then target heavy users with blackcurrant, fig and guava.

Our members must step up their efforts to be selected for the audience of Question Time, and any who prove successful should smuggle in some jam then smear it around their mouths before the cameras pan past their smiling, satisfied faces.

If called upon to ask a question, this should be framed in terms of the Government being “in a jam”, or the need to “preserve the integrity” of the United Kingdom.

It’s regrettable that Jacob Rees-Mogg did not co-operate with our request for last night’s show to include a demonstration of trickle-down economics using one of those cute mini jars you find in hotels, but there really is no limit to the number of ways in which jam could be incorporated into political debate.

Worried about the impact of a no deal on supplies of fresh fruit? Screw the lid on tightly and your jam will keep forever. Nervous about travelling overseas this summer? Stay at home, pick your own, and get your whole family hooked on jam. Concerned about the threat to workers’ rights? In a few weeks’ time you’ll finally have the absolute right to call a Great British fruit a fruit – can there be any more precious a freedom than that?