AN MSP has accused Labour of providing music tuition “for the few, not the many” after a council became Scotland’s first to propose scrapping the service for most pupils.
Midlothian Council has put forward plans to axe instrumental music tuition in schools except for pupils in S4 and above taking SQA music exams.
The controversial proposal follows an inquiry into fees charged for the service across Scotland, leading Holyrood’s Education Committee to recommend it should be free and children are losing out due to the costs involved. Last year, 25 of Scotland’s 32 councils introduced fees of up to £524.
However, a Labour MSP called on the Government to show some “honesty” around council finances, rather than blaming local authorities after cuts to core council services were voted through in the recent Scottish Budget.
SNP MSP Christine Grahame raised the issue at FMQs, saying: “Labour-led Midlothian Council is the only council in Scotland planning to axe all music tuition for pupils below S4, at the same time paying out £10 million a year in interest payments from the education budget because of Labour’s punitive PFI projects.
“With the result that if you want to play you’ll have to pay privately – music for the few not the many.”
After putting her own spin on Labour’s slogan, she said she would be joining a protest outside the council’s headquarters on Tuesday.
Labour’s Alex Rowley said: “Is it not time that we had a degree of honesty around the cuts taking place to local councils and actually have a discussion on how we are going to solve those cuts rather than blaming councils when we vote through those cuts?”
Swinney said some local authorities do not charge for music tuition and he is “absolutely certain” this will be the case once councils have set their budgets this year.
“I would encourage Midlothian Council to reflect on that position,” he said. “It is for local authorities to decide how to provide instrumental music tuition, depending on local circumstances, priorities and traditions. In taking these decisions local authorities should consider the undoubted benefits that learning a musical instrument can have on wellbeing and on attainment.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here