The National:

This article was brought to you by The Ferret.

SCOTTISH ministers have been accused of rewriting the rules and weakening legal protection for precious wildlife sites to pave the way for a controversial golf development on the north-east coast.

New guidance issued by the Scottish Government sets out the levels of protection given to endangered species in rivers, lochs, bogs and coastal areas under the international Ramsar Convention.

READ MORE: Microplastics found in guts of 100% of marine mammals in new study

As a result, conservation groups say that some sites are less protected, contradicting what the Environment Secretary, Roseanna Cunningham, told MSPs in April 2018.

One is the Ramsar site at Coul Links in East Sutherland, where a plan to build a golf course is due to be scrutinised by a public inquiry beginning on February 26.

The National:

The Scottish Government has made an “incredible and unprecedented” move that is either “straightforward ineptitude or deliberate skullduggery”, campaigners allege. They are demanding that the new guidance be urgently withdrawn.

The Government, however, insisted that it was upholding Ramsar rules. All Ramsar sites were protected under “relevant statutory regimes” by a system of “co-designation”, it said.

A guidance note was posted online on January 22, 2019 under the heading ‘Implementation of Scottish Government policy on protecting Ramsar sites’. It said that the way Ramsar sites would be protected depended on their other nature conservation designations.

Some are designated as Natura 2000 sites under European law to safeguard threatened birds, plants and other wildlife. Some are designated under Scottish law as sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs).

READ MORE: Trees face the chop as Livingston named the UK's worst town for fly-tipping

But according to conservationists, SSSIs provide weaker protection for wildlife, leaving sites such as Coul Links more vulnerable to damage. They believe that if Coul Links was protected as Ramsar sites should be, the proposed golf course would be outlawed.

They also argue that some of Scotland’s 51 Ramsar sites will be less well protected than equivalent sites in the rest of the UK.

After this prospect was first reported by The Ferret in 2018, Cunningham was quizzed in the Scottish Parliament.

“I can clarify and confirm that it continues to be Scottish Government policy to apply the same level of protection to Ramsar sites as that which is afforded to designated Natura sites,” she told MSPs on April 18, 2018.

“That provides Ramsar sites in Scotland with the same level of protection as Ramsar sites throughout the rest of the UK.”

The National:

But to the fury of wildlife groups, the new guidance suggests that the initial position has now altered.

“Changing a nature protection policy which has been in place for many years, without any consultation, just before a contentious inquiry is about to start is incredible and unprecedented,” said Aedán Smith, head of planning at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in Scotland.

“Even when Donald Trump’s infamous golf course was called in and approved there was no attempt to change the rules to apparently favour the development in this way. This move would completely undermine the Scottish Government’s efforts to be seen as an environmental leader.”

READ MORE: 'Significant' new gas discovery made in North Sea

SMITH warned the Ramsar guidance would leave Scotland “trailing behind” the rest of the UK in the protection of internationally important wildlife sites. “It directly contradicts what the Cabinet Secretary for Environment said in Parliament just last April,” he added.

“We can only hope the new policy may have been issued in error. We call on ministers to clarify their position urgently.”

According to the Scottish Wildlife Trust, one explanation was that the guidance had been issued by civil servants who had forgotten what Cunningham had told MSPs in April.

“On the other hand this could be seen as an insidious attempt to undermine the status of Ramsar sites ahead of the controversial Coul Links public inquiry due to start in a few short weeks time,” said the trust’s chief executive, Jonathan Hughes.

“Whether straightforward ineptitude or deliberate skullduggery, it’s clear that the Environment Secretary should retract the policy note, clarify her position on Ramsar site protection and consult the Scottish people on the detail on the policy in the coming months.”

READ MORE: PPAs create enough wind power for 35 million homes

Hughes added: “This whole business should be deeply concerning for anyone who cares about transparent, inclusive and fair policy making and due process in planning in Scotland.”

Plantlife Scotland argued that two nationally scarce wetland plants, Baltic rush and seaside centaury, were under threat at Coul Links and should be protected under the Ramsar convention.

“Plantlife strongly opposes any moves to downgrade the protection given to Ramsar sites, and advocates that these sites are afforded the same protection in Scotland as in the rest of the UK,” said the group’s head in Scotland, Alistair Whyte.

John Campbell QC, legal counsel for the local action group, Not Coul, said he struggled to understand why guidance had been issued now.

“To treat such a valuable and precious Ramsar site as anything less than a Natura 2000 site would on the face of it be absurd,” he told The Ferret.

The National:

The Scottish Government stressed that it was abiding by the Ramsar Convention. “All Ramsar sites are protected through co-designation with Natura 2000 sites and/or sites of special scientific interest and are protected under the relevant statutory regimes,” said a spokesperson.

“Every Ramsar site in Scotland has at least one Natura co-designation, as appropriate to the nature of the site. Scotland is meeting its Ramsar requirements.”

The Government spokesperson added: “While not specifically related to the case, the Ramsar guidance on our policy was published in response to questions arising at the reporters’ preliminary hearing for the current Coul Links golf course case.

“As with all cases assigned to reporters, ministers look forward to them providing a comprehensive report for consideration by the planning minister.”

The Ferret revealed in February 2018 that the Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing’s most senior civil servant, Liz Ditchburn, had intervened “in a facilitative role” on Coul Links. Critics warned that this could undermine public confidence in the fairness of the planning system.

The Government’s wildlife agency, Scottish Natural Heritage, declined to comment. Documents released by the agency in 2018 under freedom of information law suggested that Ramsar protection in England and Wales could be “stricter” than in Scotland.

A golf course at Coul Links has been proposed by Todd Warnock, a US developer who lives nearby in Dornoch. He has teamed up with wealthy US golf developer, Mike Keiser, to propose a £10 million championship golf course near the village of Embo.

But the area is protected from development under three different conservation laws because its unique sand dune network is home to rare and endangered plants, insects and birds.

Warnock declined to comment. He has previously accused conservationists of making “gross generalisations” that were “naive and irrelevant”.

“We are confident Coul Links offers a tremendous opportunity for ecological enhancement, as well as profound economic opportunities for the highlands,” he said.

The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at and can subscribe for £3 a month here: