AS the full details of the charges facing Alex Salmond emerged last week, no supporter of Scottish independence should have been surprised to see a theme emerging from the nation’s so-called opinion makers and shapers.
Everywhere you looked, there seemed to be another commentator suggesting that the charges would either delay or scupper for years any hopes of holding another independence referendum.
We need to challenge that groundless assumption.
First of all, we must say that the charges lodged against the former First Minister are serious. They will be tested in court and the laws of the land preclude any further discussion of the impending court case.
But the case for independence rests not on the shoulders of one man, regardless of the hugely important role he played in the 2014 referendum Nor is the pursuance of Scottish independence the prerogative of just the SNP – even if it is true that the goal will not be reached without the party’s political muscle and power.
Those who support independence do so not because of the personal charisma or the persuasive oratory of individual leaders, although those attributes help.
Independence is our goal because it represents the only way of building the type of country we want to live in.
That remains as true today as it was in 2014 and before. It will be as true tomorrow and on the day that the verdict is delivered on Alex Salmond. Indeed, the Brexit shambles has made the problems of the Union and the benefits of independence clearer than ever.
The United Kingdom has not been, is not now and will never be a partnership of equals. Force of numbers means that Scotland’s wishes will only ever have an effect when they are shared by enough voters south of the Border.
The argument that Scotland’s vote in the EU referendum should be respected will always be dismissed as long as the decisions of the constituent parts of the UK are denied equal weight.
Brexit has shown in stark terms how the union prevents Scotland from reaching its full potential.
It shows how powerless we are over our own economy which is now threatened because of an internal Tory ideological battle.
It shows how powerless we are over immigration, which Scotland both needs and welcomes and yet cannot encourage because of entirely different circumstances and attitudes in some parts of England.
It shows how the benefits of oil – which, of course, we must now always underline is NOT, NOT, NOT the key plank of an independent Scotland’s economy – were squandered by Margaret Thatcher, and will be squandered again because of skill shortages.
And it shows that Westminster is a dysfunctional place which the SNP has tried and almost certainly failed to save from itself.
The case for independence is strong and growing stronger. It depends not on the story of one man, but on the answer to a question which will be the same in a month, a year or a decade as it is today: Do we have the courage to leave a relationship which does not and can never work in our best interests, and instead take on the challenge of forging the country Scotland can become?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article