THE humiliation of the withdrawal vote was titanic. The Tories and DUP were on the run, then out popped the “lone ranger” and Tonto (Corbyn/McDonnell) to save her the humiliation of grovelling to other parties and her own people.
What a political blunder by the Labour party to give oxygen to her ego by calling for a no-confidence vote.
There she stood after the biggest ever rejection vote, to laugh and actually look smug as she spoke about all the parties pulling together. Then to my utter amazement we hear of other parties going along to her office for preliminary talks, including to their shame the SNP. Again giving her oxygen to her saying she had productive talks when she should have resigned and gone home with her tail between her legs.
READ MORE: Sturgeon: Brexit delay won't stop indyref2 update in a few weeks
Now Corbyn has played a blinder, saying no talks unless we have an agreement of “no deal being unacceptable” prior to talks. This enables Corbyn to be on the front foot where our own Mr Blackford should have been.
The Tory Prime Minister has no principles, or should I say she has an abundance of them and an attitude of “if you don’t like my principles then I can come up with many more”.
My main point is to my party and the independence movement that now is the time to say enough is enough. No more talks in the Westminster bubble – the majority of the Scottish people want leadership NOW, not the bide-your-time tactic.
Your people are hungry for action. They are intelligent, and aware of the risk aware of the biased media. Name a date for the referendum and watch the momentum go into orbit.
D Gill
Kinross
READ MORE: Scottish Greens add to growing calls for second independence referendum
I AM coming to the view that indyref2 is a matter of urgency. Why are the SNP trying to save the British state? The so-called People’s Vote is a waste of our time – Scotland has already clearly voted to stay in the EU. The British state is in disarray and the SNP should be fighting for independence, not bailing out Westminster, which is the government of a foreign country. Bring our Scots MPs home a and take this opportunity now!
Brexit means Scottish independence, so let’s make haste before we are locked and stranded on an isolated island with the lifeboat of independence cut adrift. This is the time. I ask the SNP to show courage and leadership. They have a mandate, so no need for a foreign government’s Section 30. Form an independence partnership and call indyref 2.
John R Hosie
Alloa
READ MORE: Twitter points out huge hypocrisy in Willie Rennie's indyref2 attack
ALTHOUGH the PM’s deal has been rejected, Tory and DUP MPs continue to support her administration. Mrs May has shown no intent to extend Article 50 and is not so far ruling out a no-deal outcome, despite the SNP and Labour calling for this as part of any cross-party consensus. With no obvious mechanism to broaden options, the meaningful vote will expire on March 29, when Scotland as part of the UK will leave the EU without a withdrawal agreement and with the ensuing uncertainty over its future political and economic aspirations uncharted.
Peter Gorrie
Edinburgh
THE latest Westminster fiasco over Brexit again highlights the failure of a Parliament which can’t decide if it’s a functioning part of a (semi-) democratic state or a re-enactment society for the medieval ages.
We are now in 2019 and still have to wait 20 minutes or so for MPs to vote as they are squeezed through the voting lobbies rather than pressing a button to indicate their intention. Similarly we have MPs sitting on the steps next to the benches, others crowded around the doors and even some in the “strangers” gallery as there are simply not enough seats in the Museum of Westminster.
It is no wonder the UK Parliament can’t make up its mind about the future when it is clearly still operating in the past. It’s time for Scotland to move away from this antiquated sideshow and start running our own affairs.
Cllr Kenny MacLaren
Paisley
IN all the furore regarding pursuing a democratic decision taken in 2016, why did all but one of the Scottish Tory MPs not vote according to their constituents’ declared decision? Clearly they value party loyalty and self-interest before the constituents they are there to represent. Also clearly they think that their version or vision of democracy only works when it is their favour. And since 17 million voted in favour of Brexit at that time, what about the democratic interests of the 43-odd million who were either did not vote for it or were for various reasons disenfranchised?
Nick Cole
Meigle, Perthshire
A WEEK is a long time in politics, as is 24 hours as we have all seen this week. Brexit is such a serious issue for us all, and the country is being held to ransom by a paralysed Conservative government. While MPs fight like ferrets in a sack in a rather heated environment, the question must be put, how many of those very MPs have spared a thought for the plight of those in their constituencies currently suffering right now the consequences of benefit sanctions and the roll-out of Universal Credit? Or a thought for those who have daily care needs, housing needs and health needs? All matters that have profound effects on daily living for so many, yet I would suggest they have been totally disregarded while the Westminster government fight amongst themselves over Brexit.
They have had more than two years to secure a deal, two years when they have rolled out their ruthless and savage Universal Credit policies with devastating effects. Scotland’s vulnerable and needy in society deserve better, and staying in the Westminster partnership can never deliver as we have witnessed this week.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel