THE UK Government must give details on how Scotland’s forestry and fishing sectors will be funded post-Brexit, Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing has said.
Ahead of a meeting between the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the devolved administrations, Ewing said that decisions on funding must be made to provide greater clarity.
Under current arrangements, both sectors receive investment from EU funding schemes such as the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), and Pillar 2 Rural Development funds for forestry.
Ewing said: “The potential negative impact of Brexit on Scotland’s rural economy is becoming clearer all the time. That’s in stark contrast to the lack of clarity being provided by the UK Government in response to my requests for guarantees that a fair level of funding to our fishermen and foresters will be provided by the Treasury, post-Brexit, to replace current funding from the EU.
“Although I welcome the UK Government’s recent commitment to long-term marine funding from 2021 comparable to the EMFF, it is vital that this support fairly reflects the size and requirements of Scotland’s very significant marine sector.
“More funding must be provided, which could deliver much-needed investment in a range of areas, including maritime infrastructure at ports and harbours.”
READ MORE: Corbyn faces backlash after stating preference for Brexit deal
Ewing also stated that funding commitments should be given to the forestry industry imminently, and stated that they must be long-term.
“That’s absolutely essential for a sector where projects run for years and decades rather than days and weeks,” he said.
“The Confederation of Forest Industries recently expressed their alarm that no guarantees have been provided for Pillar 2 funding, which is vital to that sector, to remain post-Brexit.
“Unless resolved immediately, we could see progress on initiatives like woodland creation schemes grinding to a halt, or being unwound – impacting on jobs, the wider rural economy, and climate change mitigation targets.
He added: “It’s completely unacceptable that Scotland is still being kept in the dark. People’s livelihoods are at stake, and I intend to get answers soon.”
Listen to The National editor Callum Baird and Paul Kavanagh discuss Scotland's escape route from Westminster rule here ...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here