THE ORDER OF THE DAY
Éric Vuillard (Picador, £12.99)
On 13 February 1938, Austrian Chancellor Kurt von Schuschnigg, summoned by Hitler to sign a document which will effectively annexe Austria, is being browbeaten by the Führer for his country’s lack of support. “The whole history of Austria is just one uninterrupted act of high treason,” Hitler rants. A popinjay suddenly confronted with his own insignificance, Schuschnigg tries to think of an undeniable Austrian contribution to Austro-German relations, but his mind is blank. Finally, in desperation, he offers up Beethoven. Who, as Hitler witheringly points out, was born and bred in Germany.
Marketed, somewhat misleadingly, as a novel, the Prix Goncourt-winning The Order of the Day is more of a stylish, stinging essay availing itself of the techniques and tricks of fiction. Its subject is the circumstances behind Germany’s invasion of Austria in 1938, but told with a novelist’s eye for irony and moral weakness. Its polemical outrage is tempered and channelled into measured prose (which may be partly due to the translation from French by Mark Polizzotti), like revenge served cold.
As much as anything else, it’s a story about capitulation and “a mysterious respect for lies” which sees the advance of the Nazis in terms of those who gave way before them. Vuillard evokes a Europe of complacency, privilege and reticence, unable to deal effectively with a brutish regime like Hitler’s. What does it take to make a man fold, he asks, and finds, depressingly, that the answer is not much. Why bother with a threat when a bluff will do the trick?
Vuillard pulls no punches and sheds no tears, not for Schuschnigg, nor for Lord Halifax, nor Chamberlain, who allowed Ribbentrop to twist him round his little finger. Where history presents us with underdogs, Vuillard sees hypocrites, like Schuschnigg and Austrian President Miklas, who had no qualms about oppressing their own population in a one-party state before the Nazis came along.
Even now, he argues, we see the Nazis just as Goebbels’ propaganda intended us to: as a well-oiled, unstoppable machine with a deadly masterplan. Vuillard adds back the pieces that don’t fit: incompetence, cheap tricks, shabbiness, the phoniness of the whole enterprise. The invasion itself is a key scene in the book. A front, in the first place, for the real work being done through diplomatic channels, the German army’s triumphant procession was scuppered by a plague of broken-down vehicles. In what should have been his hour of glory, Hitler was yelling at stuck lorries to get off the road.
Vuillard highlights another significant episode, five years earlier, when 24 German business leaders pledged money to the Nazi party. Many of their businesses, like Agfa, BASF and Bayer, are still here today, part of the unnoticed fabric of our lives. He never refers directly to the current international resurgence of the far right, but awareness of it underpins every angry, urgent word, as he warns, “We never fall twice into the same abyss. But we always fall the same way, in a mixture of ridicule and dread.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here