LABOUR could go into an early general election offering to hold a referendum on its own version of Brexit, a shadow cabinet minister has hinted.
Barry Gardiner suggested Labour would campaign on a promise to negotiate a better Brexit deal than that secured by Theresa May, and said he personally believed that could then be put to the public.
Labour's policy is to push for a general election if the Prime Minister fails to get her Brexit deal through Parliament.
But Jeremy Corbyn has come under pressure to throw his weight behind a referendum if Labour cannot force an early election.
Pressure has intensified after a large-scale opinion poll commissioned by the People's Vote campaign indicated Labour could suffer a backlash from voters if it failed to oppose Brexit in Parliament.
The YouGov poll of more than 25,000 people indicated a second referendum is backed by 75% of Labour voters.
But shadow international trade secretary Gardiner said "the quickest way of getting a people's vote" is to have a general election, because legislating for a referendum would take far longer.
At an election, Labour "would set out what we would seek to negotiate in Europe to try and deliver", he told Sky News' Sophy Ridge on Sunday.
Then "at that stage it makes sense to go to the country" with the deal on offer, he said.
"The reason Theresa May has had such a botched set of negotiations is because of her red lines.
"If we as a new, incoming Labour government were to go to Europe without those red lines we know that we could get a different, better deal and that's what we want to try and achieve.
"At that stage it makes sense to go to the country and say 'here we are, this is what we have managed to negotiate, this is the deal that we have managed to conclude because we don't have the same red lines as Theresa May, we think it's a better way forward'.
"And it seems to me, at a personal level, what I would then say is that is the time when we would then say to people 'now make your decision on what we have managed to conclude'."
London Mayor Sadiq Khan said the Brexit process should be immediately halted if May's deal is rejected by Parliament - with the decision put back to the people.
"If Parliament rejects the Prime Minister's bad deal the only sensible course of action is to withdraw Article 50 immediately," he said.
"People from every corner of our country continue to call for the British people (to) get the final say - with the option to stay in the EU."
Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry accused the People's Vote campaign of seeking to "slap the Labour Party around".
She told BBC Radio 5 Live's Pienaar's Politics: "What I would like them to be particularly focusing on is taking the arguments as to why we should remain in the European Union to people who voted to leave and to try to change some hearts and minds.
"Rather than using it - as some people I think do - as an opportunity to attack the Labour Party and the leadership of the Labour Party. "
She added: "If there was to be another referendum along the same lines as we had before, I would vote remain.
"But what I would like, if we are going to have another referendum, is to win that referendum and for us to remain in the European Union.
"What concerns me about the People's Vote movement is that instead of spending their time trying to change people's minds, they spend their time smacking the Labour Party around the head, some of them."
Labour MP Chuka Umunna, a prominent campaigner for a second referendum, told Sky News: "Let's not forget that in 2017 a huge number of younger generations voted for the Labour Party hoping that we would take the country on a different trajectory and I'm not sure that we would be forgiven for robbing them of their futures if we don't actually give them a say on this."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel