SCOTLAND’S Justice Secretary is looking at alternatives to controversial plans to merge Police Scotland and the British Transport Police (BTP) north of the Border.
Humza Yousaf told a Holyrood committee that government officials had been working with both organisations on possible options ranging from voluntary information sharing to new governance set-ups.
He said a meeting including both organisations, their oversight bodies, the department for Transport and Audit Scotland, last month resulted in the “general consensus” current legislation could be used to strengthen the role of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) in overseeing railway policing in Scotland.
The Railway Policing (Scotland) Bill paving the way for a merger was passed in June 2017, despite criticism from opposition parties, the unions and others. Integration was originally due to take place in April 2019, but the timetable was delayed and in September Yousaf said the legislation might never be enacted.
In a letter to Holyrood’s Justice Committee, he said: “My officials have been working with stakeholders to explore further the options for enhanced accountability to the Scottish Parliament. The options discussed ranged from voluntary information-sharing agreements to exploring new governance and accountability mechanisms. Last month’s event demonstrated a general consensus among stakeholders that legislation currently in force could be used to create an arrangement that facilitates a stronger oversight role for SPA in relation to railway policing in Scotland.
“Both the SPA and British Transport Police Authority have committed to exploring that option further and discussing how it might work in practice.”
He said he remains committed to keeping the commencement date of the Railway Policing (Scotland) Act “under review” and integration of the services is the Government’s long-term goal.
He added: “However, I recognise that BTP staff and officers in Scotland deserve clarity and stability going forward and I am confident that exploring the above mentioned arrangement in further detail will provide a viable medium term option to enabling governance and accountability of the delivery of railway policing in Scotland.”
Opposition parties called for the Government to scrap the merger plans in full, with Labour’s justice spokesman Daniel Johnson saying Yousaf had performed a “humiliating U-turn”.
Discussing Yousaf’s letter at the Justice Committee yesterday, members agreed to write to the organisations involved, including the Government, and seek clarity on costs and timescales for the options.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel