EUROPEAN leaders should not seek "retribution on the UK" over post-Brexit fishing arrangements, an association of fisherman in Scotland has warned.
The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) will publish its first ever annual State of the Industry Report today, with less than four months to go until the UK leaves the EU.
The document backs exiting the EU's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and calls for the UK to be able to negotiate access and quota rights as an independent coastal state by the end of 2020.
Industry bosses in Scotland have said that it is not in the interests of the EU-27 to adopt "hardline positions" on talks over future agreements on fishing.
Bertie Armstrong, SFF chief executive, said: "We are getting close to the point where Britain leaves the EU, and this will be the last December Fisheries Council that we attend before we begin the transition to coastal state in our own right.
"Sensible management of fish stocks is extremely difficult when you are facing the double whammy of an unworkable discard ban that takes little account of the mixed fishery in Scottish waters and therefore the issue of choke species and significant cuts to key stocks such as cod and haddock that will exacerbate this problem.
"If further evidence were required that the Common Fisheries Policy is a disastrous tool for fisheries management, this is it.
"But given that we have a fisheries agreement to negotiate, it would be utter folly for the EU to try to exact retribution on the UK by further punishing our hard-working fishermen instead of analysing the situation dispassionately and looking for a series of sensible, practical solutions to these problems."
Last month, all 13 Scottish Conservative MPs – including Scottish Secretary David Mundell – warned Prime Minister Theresa May that anything less than leaving the CFP by 2020 would be a "betrayal of Scotland".
They said that they could not support any deal with the EU that would "prevent the UK from independently negotiating access and quota shares" as this would mean "we would not be leaving the CFP in practice".
May won a vote on no confidence in her leadership on Wednesday, with 200 of her MPs backing her and 117 against.
It followed the cancellation of a vote on her Brexit deal, which was not expected to have enough support to pass.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel