A FORMER NHS boss was given double the pay-off she was entitled to because of the “total incompetence” of the assistant chief executive, MSPs were told.
Former NHS Tayside chief executive Lesley McLay received more than £64,000 in lieu of six months’ notice. However, she only had three months in her contract.
The pay-off came under intense scrutiny at the Scottish Parliament’s audit committee, where auditor general Caroline Gardner gave evidence.
READ MORE: NHS Scotland backs Citizen's Basic Income scheme to save thousands of lives
She said: “There was real confusion in the advice given to the acting chief executive and chair about the notice period which was relevant to the former chief executive. Her contract clearly stated that she was on three months’ notice.”
Gardner explained that, because of advice from the health board’s assistant chief executive, McLay was awarded six months’ cash and her contract amended months after she had left the role. Gardner said: “My report identifies that the person providing advice [about the severance pay] to the interim chief executive and interim chair was the assistant chief executive,” she said.
The assistant chief executive and strategic director of workforce at NHS Tayside is Dr Annie Ingram, who is still in the post. Gardner said: “The assistant chief executive wasn’t able to provide the auditor with evidence for why she believed the notice period be six months rather than three months.”
Former health secretary Alex Neil was incredulous at the auditor general’s suggestion the payoff was due to “a misunderstanding”.
The MSP said: “The director of workforce is supposed to be the person who is the professional in relation to contracts and employment.
“It’s not just confusion, it’s total incompetence if she changes the period of the contract and doesn’t even check.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel