COUNTRYSIDE living in Scotland may become impossible for many because of rises in the cost of maintaining rental property or the lack of homes for rent, according to a leading estate agency.
Experts at Bell Ingram warned of a potential crisis for those living and working in rural areas as the number of private rental properties has dropped.
It followed the introduction of legislation around maintenance and testing standards, energy efficiency and the new Private Rented Tenancy (PRT).
While the new regulations provide greater security for tenants, the company said they were driving up costs for landlords.
Bell Ingram land agent, Catherine Smith, said: “Despite the obvious positives that have come from stricter legislation around renting property privately, it may leave the rural areas of Scotland worse off in the long run.
“There is an ongoing requirement for people to live and work in the countryside and a greater need for rental property than ever in the current housing climate. The PRT has reduced the flexibility of rental property, which is absolutely key for some farms and estates that require homes for employees.
“Another pressing problem for rural rentals is the upcoming changes to Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) standards.
“Although staggered, from March 2025, all let properties must have a minimum rating of band D, which will almost certainly require work to most, if not all traditional rural properties.”
Options to renting out a property include selling or diversifying to a holiday home, but both would deprive the countryside of local people to drive the economy and may not suit estate or farm owners.
Smith added: “There is no one option that will work for all estates or farms and a full assessment of the surplus residential properties should be completed before making any decisions on the best way to move forward.
“We’re still yet to understand the full implications of changing EPC standards too. It’s not necessarily a bad thing to improve the housing anyway; it protects and maintains for the future but can be challenging when imposed with a deadline for completion.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here