SLASHING immigration after Brexit could result in businesses collapsing and jobs being lost, the head of the CBI has warned.
Carolyn Fairbairn said if the Tory government proceeds with plans to reduce the number of low-skilled migrants, it could have the same effect on the economy as the oil price shock in the 1970s.
Last month, speaking at the CBI conference, the Prime Minister said her new immigration system would stop EU workers being able to “jump the queue” to get into the UK and would instead be based on skills rather than where migrants come from.
Fairbairn told The House magazine: “We do have real concerns about a rhetoric and a policy from government that appears to be shutting off, or indicating they will shut off, all so-called low-skilled people coming into the UK.
“The impact of doing that would be so damaging for our economy and I think it is underestimated how big a shock that would be. Some have equated it to the oil price shock of the 1970s.”
If the change happened “overnight” it would see “businesses go under and we would lose jobs rather than create jobs for our population”.
She added: “I do think we need to be incredibly careful about the language we use.
“The idea that we would be talking about EU workers in our country in derogatory terms I think is something that certainly our business community would really like to see stop.”
READ MORE: David Mundell said he'd resign over his Brexit red lines ...
Fairbairn, however, did tell the magazine that businesses backed the deal being put up by May.
But yesterday there seemed little sign of any sudden groundswell in support of the Prime Minister’s deal from MPs.
With only four days until the meaningful vote on the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration in the Commons, it’s thought the Prime Minister still needs to convince another 100 MPs to have any prospect of winning.
One MP she won’t have to try too hard with is Stephen Lloyd, who yesterday quit the LibDems so he could back the deal.
“I have come to the conclusion that I cannot honestly uphold the commitment I made ... to accept the result of the referendum, vote for the deal the Prime Minister brought back from the EU and not back calls for a second referendum whilst supporting the LibDem parliamentary party’s formal position of voting against Theresa May’s deal and advocating a people’s vote,” he said.
Meanwhile, former prime minister Tony Blair suggested May should pull next Tuesday’s vote, rather than risk a humiliating loss.
“Personally, I don’t see what the point is in going down to a huge defeat,” he said.
The prospect of delaying the vote was supported by Sir Graham Brady, the chairman of the 1922 Committee of backbench Tory MPs.
He said he would welcome the vote being deferred if no solution could be found to differences within the party over the backstop.
The influential MP told BBC2’s Newsnight: “I think the most important thing is to have clarity about how we might remove ourselves from a backstop ... if we were to enter into one in the future.
“It’s having the answer to that question of substance that is most important, not the timing, so if that question can be answered in the course of the next few days then all well and good.”
Chief whip Julian Smith acknowledged he faced an “uphill challenge” to persuade MPs to back May’s deal, but insisted that “it’s all to play for” and that there was no plan B.
Asked if May would survive to the end of the month, Smith said he was “confident Theresa May will be the Prime Minister after the meaningful vote and will be the Prime Minister at and after Christmas”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here