THE more English a person feels the more likely they are to believe immigration has had a negative impact on Britain’s economy and culture, a new survey has revealed.
But despite the survey finding that SNP voters were the most likely to be positive about the cultural and economic affects of immigration, there was little difference between the overall views of those north and south of the Border.
The new data is part of the English and Welsh and Scottish attitudes towards immigration report produced by the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) and published today.
It brings together data from the recent British and Scottish Social Attitudes surveys, conducted by the NatCen and ScotCen during the second half of 2017.
It found that the majority of people in both England and Wales and Scotland were more positive about immigration than negative.
In Scotland, 46% viewed immigration as good for Britain’s economy, while 43% of Scots felt it enriched the country’s culture.
This was similar to England and Wales where 47% of people thought immigration was good for the economy and 43% that it was good for its culture.
However, when NatCen looked at views based on political alliance and national identity, it found that the more English people felt the more likely they were to view immigration negatively.
While 43% of respondents who identified as English not British said immigration was bad for the economy, 32% said it had undermined British culture.
This compared to 17% and 8% of those who identified as British not English respectively.
Leave voters in both regions were much more likely to be negative about the impact of migration.
Report author and senior research fellow at NatCen
Sir John Curtice said there
did not appear to be any consistent link in Scotland between identity and perceptions of the economic consequences of migration.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel