A LEADING conservation charity could take further action despite losing a high-profile legal battle over an offshore wind farm.
RSPB Scotland sought to block the £1.8 billion Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) project in the Firth of Forth over fears it would damage bird populations.
In 2016, judge Lord Stewart upheld a legal challenge brought by the organisation against this and three other schemes designed to power a combined 1.4 million homes.
RSPB Scotland hard argued that permissions granted by the Scottish Government were a breach of legal requirements. But last year an appeal judge overturned this in a move described by commentators as a “victory” for renewables.
Yesterday, EDF Renewables UK announced that it has secured consent from the Scottish Government for an “improved design” for NnG, which will see fewer, taller turbines installed almost 16km from the shore.
The changes reduce the number of units from 75 to a maximum of 54.
But, stretching to a height of 208 metres above sea level, they will be capable of delivering the same 450 megawatts of energy – enough to power 375,000 homes for a year – with generation beginning in 2023.
According to the company, the revised design makes use of “the latest advances in offshore wind technology”.
The firm’s project director Matthias Haag commented: “This is great news and we are excited to move forward delivering this milestone project for Scotland which will provide low carbon energy for decades to come.”
However, responding to the news, RSPB Scotland said: “There have undoubtedly been significant improvements to this project as technological advancements have enabled the use of fewer, bigger wind turbines and the predicted harm to seabirds has reduced as a result.
“However, Scotland’s internationally renowned populations of gannets, kittiwakes and razorbills still face unprecedented risks from this and other offshore wind farms in Scotland and elsewhere in the North Sea.
“We will therefore be considering the detail of this decision very carefully over the coming days.”
Calling for the industry and the Scottish Government to aid seabird conservation, the charity went on: “There is no question that more renewable energy is needed to tackle climate change, but the current approach to offshore wind risks creating a new environmental problem that could decimate our precious seabird populations.
“The offshore wind industry is now a major player in Scotland’s marine environment, with a long term stake in the sustainable use of our seas.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel