LABOUR and the SNP have dismissed reports that they are in talks about a possible DUP-style confidence and supply agreement.
According the Sunday Times, MPs from both parties have been openly discussing ways to work together if a snap general election returns a minority Jeremy Corbyn government.
The report says the SNP will prop up Labour in return for a second referendum on Scottish independence.
One SNP minister told the paper: “There’s been a sea change in relations with Labour in London. They’ve got a sniff of power and they know how significant the SNP are likely to be.”
But Labour’s Neil Findlay rubbished the proposal.
“The only progressive alliance Labour wants is with the trade unions,” he said.
“Theresa May says she wants to unite the UK but all she is doing is risking more division,” he added.
A spokeswoman for the SNP said there was nothing to the story.
Over the weekend, Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said it would be an “absolute no” to a second independence referendum if Corbyn took over at Number 10.
“The vast majority believe there was a decisive result to the Scottish independence referendum, so why do we need another?” he said.
In September he promised that UK Labour’s next General Election manifesto would commit the party to oppose a second independence referendum.
But earlier this month Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell refused to rule out another vote.
“We’ll consider whatever proposals come from Scotland, of course. These are devolved issues that need to be discussed overall,” he told the BBC’s Sunday Politics.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel