TEACHERS in two trade unions have voted almost unanimously to reject the pay deal put forward by Scottish ministers.
EIS general secretary Larry Flanagan said the “landmark” 98% vote against the pay deal by his union was “one of the strongest rejections of an offer in EIS history”.
Meanwhile, the SSTA union announced 97% of its members who voted against the offer. Almost three-quarters of eligible members in both unions took part in the ballots.
Education Secretary John Swinney said the offer to teachers was “the best pay deal in the UK for 2018-19”, adding it was “disappointing” it was rejected.
A third union, the NASUWT, said it would now “consider a formal ballot for industrial action” in the pay row after a survey of more than 1000 teachers found 54% are so angry about the current pay deal they are prepared to take action.
Swinney has already said while teachers are being offered a 3% pay rise across the board, restructuring of the main pay grade scale and annual progression meant most teachers would receive a rise of between 5% and 11%.
“This was the best pay deal in the UK for 2018-19 so it is disappointing that teachers have rejected what I believe was a strong and fair offer,” he said. “All teachers on the main grade scale were offered at least a 5% annual increase, with some receiving up to 11% in conjunction with their annual progression.”
Swinney added ministers would “engage positively with the unions and with Cosla to seek to strike a pay deal”.
The EIS, Scotland’s largest teaching union, has campaigned for a 10% rise for all teachers, with tens of thousands of protesters taking to the streets of Glasgow last month to support the cause.
Gail Macgregor, resources spokeswoman for the local government body Cosla, said: “The trade union's claim for 10% increase in one year cannot be met within the resources we currently have available.”
Flanagan said: “Today’s near-unanimous rejection of the pay offer is a landmark result, one of the strongest rejections of an offer in EIS history and one which is indicative of the current mood of Scotland’s teachers, increasingly agitated on pay but angry also at excessive workloads, mainstreaming on the cheap and austerity driven cuts to resources.”
EIS president Alison Thornton added that while the union still hoped to reach a negotiated agreement it is “fully prepared to ballot for industrial action should this be necessary to secure a fair deal”.
She added: “We urge the Scottish Government and Cosla to return to the negotiating table with a greatly improved offer, before it is too late.”
SSTA general secretary Seamus Searson said there was a “resounding rejection of the pay offer” from his union’s members.
He said: “The Government and employers have underestimated teachers and tried to create division within different grades of teachers.
“With 97% of respondents rejecting the pay offer, it is a strong message to the Government as to the feelings of teachers.
“It is time for Government to return to the negotiating table and treat teachers with respect and seek a meaningful settlement. The SSTA looks forward to productive talks at the negotiating table in the coming days.”
Meanwhile, 56% of the teachers surveyed by the NASUWT indicated they would be willing to take more than one day of strike action as part of the row over pay.
Chris Keates, NASUWT general secretary, commented: “The NASUWT will be conveying the outcome of the survey to employers and to Government and the union will consider a formal ballot for industrial action on pay, depending on their response.”
Macgregor urged teachers to “recognise the real value” of the deal being offered and “act accordingly”.
She also said industrial action by teachers would “disrupt schools and the education of children and young people.”
She added: “This is both unnecessary and unwarranted and will not result in an unaffordable 10% pay increase.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here