MIKE Russell has accused David Mundell of lying over the SNP's Brexit stance.
At a Joint Minesterial Committee (JMC) meeting Mundell claimed he was trying to get the best deal for Scotland and accused Russell of changing his position on a Brexit deal in the meeting to pursue an “independence agenda”.
He said: “The big change today was after 14 meetings where he had previously said what a bad outcome no deal would be for Scotland and the UK, Mike Russell said today SNP MPs would be backing no deal."
But the Scottish Brexit Secretary accused Mundell of lying.
He tweeted: "If press reports are correct then you have lied about my position at the JMC and must withdraw the quote “Mike Russell said today SNP MPs would be backing no deal”. I said we would not vote for PMs deal but would work with others to get an alternative."
.@DavidMundellDCT - if press reports are correct then you have lied about my position at the JMC and must withdraw the quote “Mike Russell said today SNP MPs would be backing no deal”. I said we would not vote for PMs deal but would work with others to get an alternative.
— Michael Russell (@Feorlean) November 19, 2018
Speaking as he left the JMC, Russell described Theresa May’s deal as “an emergency” that “must be stopped”.
“It’s an emergency for all the nations in in these islands to stop this deal,” he said. “This deal is a disastrous deal.
“Mundell knows the damage this will do to Scotland – it’s beyond belief and in those circumstances the first thing to do is to stop this deal.
“It is not this deal or nothing – that’s nonsense that is being sold vigorously by some of the people in that meeting.”
Russell said if the SNP was unable to stop the “unacceptable deal” then indyref2 should follow.
“The wrong thing to happen here is for Theresa May to dig in, which she has already done, and just say she is the only one that has the answers,” he said.
“She is not and it’s important to say that.
“If the unacceptable deal goes through – and I never predict these things – there will be substantial economic damage and then I’m happy to say we will have to say to the people of Scotland ‘make your choice’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel