ON Tuesday, the Welsh Government, which is run by Labour, will bring forward a motion to repeal the Continuity Act that Assembly Members passed in March. As studious readers of
The National may be aware, continuity bills were passed in both Holyrood and Cardiff Bay following the publication of the UK Government’s Withdrawal Bill.
The Withdrawal Bill set out Westminster’s intentions in relation to the process of leaving the EU, and when it was announced – under the original title of “Great Repeal Bill” – one paragraph in particular raised immediate concerns for Plaid Cymru and the SNP.
Section 4.2 stated that EU responsibilities relating to devolved fields such as agriculture, environment and transport would be claimed by Westminster, making English MPs responsible for devolved matters in Wales and Scotland for the first time since before devolution.
This is what led me to propose unilateral legislative action by introducing a Welsh Continuity Bill that would enshrine all existing EU regulations into Welsh law.
The purpose of this Bill was to ensure that the standards we value, affecting environmental protections, food standards and the rights we have come to take for granted as EU citizens continue to apply in Wales after Brexit.
It was also designed to stop the Conservatives’ EU Withdrawal Bill turning into a Westminster power grab over already devolved matters.
On March 21, 2018, the National Assembly for Wales passed the bill and it looked like we had secured a vital legislative shield to protect Wales from the Westminster power grab. Scotland followed only hours later.
What happens next was a stark exemplar of the difference between having a weak Labour government in Wales and a strong SNP government in Scotland.
The UK Government threatened Wales and Scotland with legal action over their respective continuity bills. Eight days later First Minister of Wales Carwyn Jones folded and agreed a deal with Westminster. The First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon, doubled down.
The Scottish Government’s Continuity Act is now awaiting judgment by the Supreme Court as to whether it is within Holyrood’s competence.
If it finds in Scotland’s favour, it means that both continuity bills are upgraded to being platinum-plated legislative shields, a vital component of our countries’ constitutional armoury.
These acts would prevent Westminster from legislating in devolved fields. The UK Government would then have a choice.
They could respect the decisions of the devolved parliaments and the courts. I would describe the chances of this happening as “unlikely”. Or they could invoke the principle of “Westminster sovereignty” and legislate over the heads and against the will of the devolved parliaments.
If they did this, I can imagine a great many people would conclude that the only reasonable reaction to such an outrage would be to support independence.
Repealing the Welsh Continuity Act would mean consenting to allow the Westminster government to legislate in devolved fields. This would be wrong in principle and also completely anti-democratic.
Wales voted for these powers in 1997 and voted for more powers in 2011. When asked, Welsh voters have twice given a mandate for more powers to be transferred to the National Assembly. They have never voted for powers to be given away.
My fellow Assembly Members should represent the views of the people of Wales by voting against repealing the Continuity Act.
But I’m not holding my breath. When it comes to the crunch, Labour in Wales will always seek an opportunity to align themselves with the other Unionist parties, rather than act in Wales’s best interests.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel