THERESA May’s Brexit plan is “profoundly undemocratic” and would lock the UK into the EU’s rules, Jacob Rees-Mogg warned fellow Tories.
The leader of the party’s influential European Research Group urged colleagues to reject the blueprint.
READ MORE: Sturgeon demands Scotland is given equal treatment in Brexit deal
In his letter, Rees-Mogg, pictured, below, said the deal would see the UK hand over £39 billion to the European Union for “little or nothing in return”.
READ MORE: What’s going to happen? The Brexit scenarios for the weeks ahead
Arch-Brexiteer Rees-Mogg also said the deal was unacceptable to Unionists because of its treatment of Northern Ireland and broke Tory manifesto commitments.
In a call for revolt on the Tory benches, he said: “For these reasons I can not support the proposed agreement in Parliament and would hope that Conservative MPs would do likewise.”
READ MORE: Mundell ‘content’ with May’s Brexit agreement despite threats to quit
He wrote: “The proposed agreement will see the UK hand over £39bn to the EU for little or nothing in return. The prospect of an agreed free trade agreement is as far away today as it always has been.”
The 15-page political declaration on the future relationship was “neither binding nor clear” and “if it aims to put in place the Chequers proposal it is neither workable nor respectful of the referendum result”.
In an echo of the argument on the Vote Leave bus, Rees-Mogg said: “In the absence of a trade agreement we should spend our money on our own priorities, for instance £39bn could pay for 26,000 nurses for 40 years.”
He warned: “This agreement will lock us into an EU customs union and EU laws. This will prevent us pursuing a UK trade policy based around our priorities and economy.
READ MORE: Theresa May teeters on brink despite Cabinet support for EU deal
“Without the ability to regulate our own economy and form our own trade agreements we will lose out on the opportunities that Brexit affords us.”
READ MORE: The SNP's reasoned responses to Tory disrespect are no longer sufficient
Agreeing to the rules of the customs union “in contravention of the 2017 Conservative manifesto, without any votes or influence, is profoundly undemocratic”, he added.
“This is compounded by the lack of any ability for the UK to unilaterally escape, making the UK a permanent rule taker.”
READ MORE: Theresa May's latest Brexit fudge is as useless as her others
He said the proposals would treat Northern Ireland differently from the rest of the UK, which was unacceptable to Unionists in both Northern Ireland and Scotland.
The letter comes a day after Rees-Mogg suggested his patience with May was running out.
The Tory MP said on Tuesday that “there comes a point at which the policy and the individual become so intimately connected that it will be very hard to carry on supporting the person who is promoting this policy”.
That message marked a shift from Rees-Mogg, who had previously held back from calling for May’s removal.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel