A CALL has been made for the speed limit to be cut to 40mph on some rural roads due to safety concerns on cycling routes.
The plea follows the publication of new research that has branded 57% of National Cycle Network routes in Scotland “very poor”.
All of the routes classified as “very poor” are on-road, and more than half (56%) of the issues on the network in Scotland are related to concerns about traffic safety.
A further 2% are classed as “poor” in the first ever UK-wide audit of the National Cycle Network, carried out by walking and cycling charity Sustrans Scotland.
The review makes 15 recommendations to improve the network, including reducing the speed limit to 20mph in urban areas and 40mph in rural areas where the routes are on-road.
“Scotland’s unique geography means that a large proportion of National Cycle Network routes here are based on rural roads,” said Sustrans Scotland national director John Lauder.
“While it is heartening to see that the majority of our off-road routes are ‘good’ or ‘very good’, which reflects the investment by the Scottish Government and the commitment by our partners, we still face a big challenge where National Cycle Network routes are on public roads.
“Reducing the speed limit to 40mph on on-road sections of the National Cycle Network as part of a range of complementary measures will help make these popular walking and cycling routes safer, better and more reliable for all users.
“Scottish Government investment of £6.9 million in the National Cycle Network has allowed us to upgrade and develop a number of key sections of route, including some which have been identified as priorities within this report. However there is still more which needs to be done.”
Scotland has a total of 2,657 miles of National Cycle Network routes stretching from the Borders to the Shetland Islands. Of this, a total of 1,523 miles (57%) has been rated as “very poor”, with a further 45 miles (2%) as “poor”. Only 52 miles (2%) of route is of “very good” standard and a further 1,036 miles (39%) has been classified as “good”.
Only 29% of the network in Scotland is traffic-free but 95% of these sections of route were classified as “good” or “very good”.
Across the UK, 1% of routes were classed as “very good”, 53% were “good”, 4% were “poor” and 42% were “very poor”, with 62% of on-road routes classified as “very poor”.
As part of the Paths for Everyone report, Sustrans has published an action plan for Scotland outlining six projects, to be delivered by 2023, to help improve and develop the network.
They include the re-routing of three on-road sections of route to alternative traffic-free paths, making accessibility improvements to existing traffic-free routes, the resurfacing and signage of a traffic-free path and the creation of a new section of network, which will link National Route 765 to National Route 7.
“This is a timely review of the National Cycle Network,” said Transport Secretary Michael Matheson. “The success of the network is critical in encouraging both walking and cycling trips for everyday journeys and especially shorter journeys.
“Having the right accessible infrastructure in the right place, which is well maintained and well promoted, is key to achieving our shared active travel ambitions and building an active nation – where more people can enjoy the benefits of walking and cycling than ever before.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel