TRANSPORT Secretary Michael Matheson will be urged this week to end a contract with the Dutch company which runs Scotland’s trains and bring them into public ownership.
MSPs are to vote on Wednesday on whether the Government should enforce the ScotRail “break clause” to bring the current franchise to an end in 2022.
Under the terms of the agreement with the train operator, ministers can exercise an opportunity in 2020 to end the franchise by its first expiry date two years later if the firm fails to meet its obligations. The franchise is currently run by Dutch state-owned Abellio, whose 10-year contract began in 2015.
Former transport minister Humza Yousaf pledged to work up a public sector bid two years ago after criticism of Abellio’s performance.
He argued that the operator had not been good enough as he urged unions and opposition parties to work with him to produce a public sector alternative.
Yousaf spoke out as performance data from ScotRail showed 86% of trains arrived at their destination on time or were less than five minutes late from October 16 to November 12 in 2016. ScotRail was forced to produce a performance improvement plan in September that year, at the request of Transport Scotland, after punctuality and reliability fell below expected standards.
The Holyrood vote on Wednesday has been initiated by Labour which supports renationalisation of the railways. Earlier this year it emerged the Transport Secretary will allow Abellio to breach the franchise performance levels in a “temporary waive” until June 2019. He reached this deal with the firm after they had already hit breach level, without informing Parliament.
Scottish Labour transport spokesman Colin Smyth said: “Passengers across Scotland are fed up with overcrowded, overpriced and late running trains. It’s time to hit the brakes on privatisation and bring our railways back into public ownership.
“The SNP claimed the Abellio contract would be a world-leading deal – instead the Government has shifted the goal posts on targets and given the franchise a licence to fail. For years the nationalists have said they would work up a public sector bid, but that promise appears further behind schedule than the average train journey in Scotland.
If the SNP was serious about a public sector bid it would be ready to step in at the first opportunity to end the franchise. On Wednesday Labour will make the case to end the franchise at the first opportunity and accelerate the process for public ownership.”
The Scottish Government said: “We know performance is not where it should be – that is why ministers can and do hold Abellio ScotRail to account within the terms of the franchise agreement. This includes the ability to end the contract if its terms are not met and it is in the public interest to do so.
“ScotRail performance has remained consistently ahead of the GB average, but that GB average has got steadily worse since Network Rail moved timetable planning for Scotland to its Milton Keynes HQ in 2012. It is clear these essential railway functions must be devolved back to Scotland to allow any franchise operator to perform at its best.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel