THE public inquiry into a controversial bid to build a golf course in a Highland beauty spot could be launched in February, it has been claimed.
Councillors voted to approve US investors’ plans for an 18-hole championship course at dunes in Sutherland during the summer.
However, the application was called in by ministers amid fierce arguments about whether or not it should go ahead.
Critics of the Coul Links proposal have compared it to Donald Trump’s Aberdeenshire development, with charities citing serious fears about the impact on wildlife in an area that has been given special designations for its natural importance.
But backers, including many community voices, say Sutherland needs the jobs and investment, while the developers themselves have refuted concerns about environmental impact.
A summit will be held in Dornoch today as Holyrood officials continue the planning process.
The pre-examination meeting comes ahead of a public inquiry expected to begin early in 2019 and predicted to last for several weeks.
It is thought that the first session could be held in February.
Meanwhile, today’s meeting is expected to cover the processes that will lead to the eventual decision.
Ahead of the talks, a coalition of conversation groups said it would continue to fight against approval.
The body, which includes Buglife Scotland, Butterfly Conservation Scotland, Marine Conservation Society, National Trust for Scotland, Plantlife Scotland, RSPB Scotland and the Scottish Wildlife Trust, said: “If approved and built this golf course would damage an area which is incredibly important for wildlife, and heavily protected by several environmental designations.”
It went on: “The proposals would completely destroy over 14 hectares of internationally important, unique, and irreplaceable, dune habitats. The risk of disturbance would be widespread as the development site includes over 140 hectares of the protected wildlife site. The proposed construction of the golf course would result in significant disruption to the natural dune processes and ecosystems.”
However, developer Todd Warnock says his £10 million proposal would protect, not damage, local flora and fauna, bringing “significant economic and environmental benefits”.
When the application was called-in in August, he told reporters: “Highland Council’s north planning applications committee, as the competent planning authority, took an emphatic decision in June and, apart from a single narrow objection from Scottish Natural Heritage, the statutory bodies involved are not opposed to the plans after a comprehensive assessment.
“The project also has overwhelming support from local people.”
A UK Site of Special Scientific Interest and a European Special Protected Area, Coul Links, near Embo, is home to numerous bird and insect species.
Warnock said his development has “environmental integrity at its heart” and would aid, not harm bird species.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel