POLICE Scotland’s former top officer Phil Gormley has claimed he was put under political pressure to hire a Scot when he was trying to fill a vacant post for a deputy chief constable.
During a meeting in September last year, Gormley was allegedly told by Andrew Flanagan, the then chair of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), that “there would be major presentational and political problems if either of the two internal (Scottish) candidates were passed over given how this would impact on the proportion of senior officers who were of Scottish national origin”.
According to papers obtained by The Times, Gormley said he was told the Scottish Government were also “party to these concerns”.
He said: “As a senior officer of English national origin myself, this concerned me. The national origin of any candidate (from within the United Kingdom) should have no bearing on the selection process.
“This issue and the very mention of the national origin of senior officers gave rise to an inference that issues of race may be at play in relation to my own position at Police Scotland and the difficulties I have faced there.”
Gormley made the claims in October last year to the Police Investigations & Review Commissioner (Pirc), who were examining bullying allegations made against him by Malcolm Graham, the assistant chief constable.
Graham was one of the Scottish applicants for the deputy post.
Gormley left the force in February this year. At the time he quit the Pirc was investigating four complaints against the chief, while another three were being assessed internally.
Gormley, who recently took up a senior post with Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services in England, did not comment, but David Morgan, his solicitor, said that the former chief would co-operate with any official request by the Scottish Government or Parliament.
However, a Parliament spokesperson said the sub-committee on policing “had no plans to hear from Mr Gormley”.
A government spokesman said it was a matter for the SPA.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel