EXTENDING the transition period for the UK leaving the EU could be a double-edged sword for the fishing industry.
While the white fish sector fears it increases the chances of being sailed down the river in negotiations, the creel fishing and hand diving industry believes it could help the sector stay afloat.
“Another year gives us more breathing space to convince Whitehall that they are in danger of destroying the work of people in coastal communities around Scotland,” said Alistair Sinclair, national co-ordinator of the Scottish Creel Fishermen’s Federation.
“A hard Brexit could bring the demise of the inshore fleet. We are low impact and high value but we could be facing meltdown after Brexit if it means extra veterinary checks at ports. The bulk of our product is live in tanks and time is of the essence. If there are delays of even three or four hours it will destroy our industry.
“At the moment we have a very slick system in place. If the system fails due to delays, a whole catch can be lost and there is no point in us fishing unless we have markets.”
Reports yesterday suggested that Scots Tory MPs were planning to vote down the Chancellor’s forthcoming Budget if the UK Government “betrayed” Scotland by including fishing rights in any extended negotiations.
However there are fears in the white fish sector that an extension will mean their interests will be sold out.
“The longer it goes on, the chances are the industry could be used as negotiating capital,” said Mike Park, chief executive of the Scottish White Fish Producers’ Association.
“What we want is to come out and be a coastal state with complete control over access to our waters so we can sit down and negotiate with other countries their share of stocks.
Park said under the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy, the fixed share that the UK was given was not enough. “The UK currently has 36% of the shell fish and fish in its waters and the other 64% is removed by the EU.
“If you look at Norway it has 85% and Iceland has 90%. What we are asking for is something in between.
“At the end of the day the EU is going to fight hard to maintain their current share but if they are catching all their quota in our waters there is a good deal to be done. If they don’t have access there is no sense in having all that quota.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel