DAVID Mundell is threatening to resign – as of 12pm, October 19, 2018.
Who knows where we could be in an hour? It seems the Scotland Secretary's position is a flexible one.
You might remember that at the start of the week, alongside Ruth Davidson, Mundell wrote a letter to the Prime Minister with a warning.
In their words, if additional customs controls were introduced between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, preventing a hard border in Ireland, they'd go.
In reality, what it meant was that they threatened to resign if Scotland got a Brexit deal that was less devastating than it could be.
“Any differentiated deal that puts a hard border down the Irish Sea they consider a resigning matter,” a senior Tory source told the Sunday Times.
"Senior Tory source" definitely ISN'T code for David Mundell and Ruth Davidson, of course...
Naturally then, two days later Mundell was saying he did not threaten to resign.
"I haven't threatened to resign. What I've said is that I regard the integrity of the United Kingdom as absolutely essential in these negotiations."
Clear on that, everyone? He's not flip-flopping, his threatening letter to the PM was just meant to help, and that senior source was totally wrong.
Imagine our surprise today when we saw the Telegraph's front page in Scotland: "Mundell may quit over EU transition."
This time around, he's sending a letter "interpreted as a resignation threat", warning that he won't accept an extension to the Brexit transition period that applies to the Common Fisheries Policy.
The UK will become an independent coastal state in March next year, but a 21-month implementation period means it will not negotiate with the EU as such until December 2020.
An extension to the transition period could take that date even further – but it would be a truly remarkable move if May were to cut out the fisheries policy from the proposals, as Mundell is asking her to.
In his letter, he even cites Scottish Government figures highlighting the risks: "On Brexit day next year we will become a coastal state, but we have now, to our annoyance, agreed to run on the rules of the CFP for an implementation period. That simply cannot be extended, it is not acceptable.
“We are watching the confusion that exists, we are already talking at the highest level, and our views have been made absolutely clear.
“Our biggest defence in all of this is an extremely strong line of irrefutable logic. We will become an independent coastal state with a load of rights and responsibilities and that will mean a very great deal. In the words of a Scottish Government report, £500 million a year, and 5000 jobs, are at stake here. We must get on with capturing that opportunity.”
If this is his idea of standing up for Scotland, it's a truly laughable one.
Taking his actions this week as a whole, it's beautifully short-sighted too – scared of giving yet more ammunition to the independence, he's hopping around, willing to accept a Brexit that would devastate Scotland if it keeps the country in the UK.
It'd be surprising, but this is a man who this week said he'd defend the Union "to his last breath".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel