THE author of Article 50 has warned that prejudiced and "short-sighted Little Englanders" are hemming Scotland in.
John Kerr, the former diplomat who wrote the mechanism under which Britain will leave the European Union, was making the case for a People's Vote, writing in The Herald.
Kerr, now a crossbench member of the House of Lords, argued that Brexit was a "historic mistake".
He said: "Scots of all parties and none should rally behind the People’s Vote cause. Glasgow and Edinburgh have long been great European cities. We mustn’t let short-sighted Little Englander prejudice hem us in.
"My grandfather was on the Somme. My parents met in 1930s slump Glasgow: their Hillhead home was blitzed in 1941. We should heed the lessons of history."
His remarks came after confirmation from First Minister Nicola Sturgeon that SNP MPs would back a People's Vote in Westminster, which is opposed by the Prime Minister.
Kerr wrote: “61% of Scots, and a rising majority in the UK as a whole, want a People’s Vote on the outcome of the current negotiations.
"So it was good to see the First Minister say on Sunday that SNP MPs would back such a Vote when the Westminster crunch comes. How Scots MPs vote could be decisive.”
In making his case, Kerr also cited the damage of the First World War: "At Glasgow Academy we walked to classes past the inscribed names, more than 300 names, of former pupils killed in the First World War. We learned how division in Europe can bring heartbreak to Scotland."
Kerr, who drafted Article 50 as Secretary-General of the European Convention, has also been the ambassador to the EU and US and a Foreign Office permanent secretary.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel