JOHN Swinney has told the SNP conference he will not back down in the debate over P1 assessments, accusing Labour, LibDem and Tory MSPs of opposing the tests out of pure “tribal, SNP-bad politics”.
Speaking at the conference in Glasgow, Swinney said assessing children was about making sure their needs are being met.
Last month MSPS across party lines joined forces to pass a motion calling for a “halt” to the tests.
READ MORE: The SNP have lost ground among key groups they need to win over
The largely symbolic motion did not bind the government to any action, but Swinney said he would “reflect” on the defeat.
Yesterday, the Deputy First Minister said he would look to tweak the tests.
“I know there are voices who do not agree with the government on these assessments out a genuine pursuit out of what they believe is in the best interests of children. I respect that view. And I’m currently looking at ways to reassure their concerns.
“But I also know political opportunism when I see it.
“The sight of Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Tories – the Tories most of all – suddenly discovering that they vehemently oppose P1 assessments after decades of delivering these assessments themselves in councils across the land is jaw dropping.
“It is easily the worst example of the tribal, SNP-bad politics of the unionist parties I have seen in years.
“These parties have no right to play politics with the education of children and young people in Scotland.”
Earlier yesterday at a fringe event organised by teaching union the EIS, Swinney was also pushed on faltering pay negotiations between teachers and the government.
Last week, the EIS threatened industrial action after they dismissed a “derisory” offer of a 3% pay rise, insisting on a 10% hike.
Larry Flanagan, the general secretary of the EIS told delegates, that the union’s ask was a “modest” one.
“There is a direct correlation between those countries which pay their teachers well and those countries which perform well in PISA results. It’s not just about pay, but paying your teachers well is symptomatic of valuing your teachers, and valuing the profession.”
He added that the actual drop in teachers’ real time pay over the last 10 years was closer to 24%.
“The average OECD pay for primary teachers is the equivalent to £42,000, for secondary teachers it’s £45,000. In Scotland it’s £36,000.
“If you value education, value teachers.”
Swinney said the offer made needed to be seen within the “context of public sector pay policy and the constraints that have been made over the last 10 years.
“I took some difficult decisions as finance secretary to constrain public sector pay with the single objective of maintaining public sector employment. I didn’t think it was wise of me to take a step that would jeopardise public sector employment during the acute period of austerity and recession that we have faced.
“What the government has put on the table, in partnership with our local authority colleagues, is an offer, that for some teachers will increase their salary by 5%, by other teachers will increase their salary by 11%.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel