LIVING in London, I often get asked what the English think of Scottish independence, and whether it matters.
Of course, the answer largely depends on who you mean by “the English”. The growing group of “English Scots for Yes” clearly think that Scottish independence is a great idea – while contemptuous English Tory MPs at Westminster clearly don’t.
It’s also a difficult question to answer objectively. Polls tell you, for example, that 22% of English voters support Scottish independence, but also that a staggering 63% of Leave voters would accept an independent Scotland as the price of Brexit.
But these figures don’t tell you anything about the respondents’ actual thoughts on Scottish independence, so any attempt to answer the question is going to be subjective.
READ MORE: Sturgeon warns of Brexit threat to efforts to tackle inequality
And, if London and the south-east is anything to go by, there’s an additional complication. Because while most people, if pressed, will offer an opinion on Scottish independence, the most striking thing is that it is simply not regarded as a live issue and is pretty much ignored.
Despite independence dominating Scottish politics, despite the de facto restructuring of Scottish Labour, LibDems and Tories into a Unionist bloc and despite a steady stream of SNPBad stories in the Scottish press, my experience is that the average English person doesn’t normally think about Scotland at all.
So why not? Partly, it’s the London-centric nature of British media. There were two years of very visible campaigning before the September 2014 referendum.
But living in London you wouldn’t have known – it was ignored in the press and on TV until the last few weeks, at which point a Guardian article claimed the problem wasn’t that the media was biased and pro-Union but that it was focused on London. They were wrong about the media bias but hit the nail on the head with the London focus.
Since 2014, non-reporting of Scottish issues has had a more positive driver – Scotland does things differently (think NHS, preparing a public-sector rail bid, banning private contractors from benefit assessments) and none among UK Government, the Opposition or the media which – right and left – supports the establishment want to deal with awkward “if they can do that, why can’t we?” questions, or give positive publicity to the SNP.
READ MORE: Brexit privatisation threat hangs over Scotland's NHS
But whatever the motive, the effect is the same. If news media – the source of most people’s information – resolutely ignore something, then that thing is assumed to have no importance and so it’s unsurprising that most English people don’t give Scotland any thought.
What might appear to be English insularity or arrogance is actually the result of a kind of reverse advertising – don’t give it any publicity and nobody will notice it.
And it seems to be working.
But, trying to explain all this to a small left-wing group in London, I was met with genuine bewilderment and what is best described as polite scepticism:
- But you voted No – no-one’s interested in independence now
- Labour wouldn’t work with the Tories
- You couldn’t afford it
- Why isn’t this in the news then?
- This isn’t the time to break up our country
You’ll also notice the Anglo-centricity – if it wasn’t news in England, then it wasn’t really happening.
This is the consequence of being part of the country that has 84% of the UK population and a media that routinely conflates England with the UK.
But, while English ignorance of Scottish issues is irritating, does it really matter?
I suspect not. English people reliant on the mainstream press and TV are certainly going to be surprised when indyref2 arrives. But they now have their own problems and I really don’t see anyone setting up a grassroots “Keep Scotland” campaign.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel