GERMANY’S government has urged those aggrieved by the suspected killing of a man by migrants in Chemnitz to distance themselves from far-right extremists who have participated in violent, xenophobic protest marches.
The fatal stabbing of 35-year-old carpenter Daniel Hillig in the eastern city on August 26 sparked a series of rallies, some of which erupted into violence.
Protesters looked on as neo-Nazis performed the stiff-armed “Hitler salute”, chanted “foreigners out” and harassed journalists covering the demonstrations.
“If one doesn’t think this way it would be good to draw a clear line and distance oneself from those who are doing that,” said government spokesman Steffen Seibert.
He echoed comments by Chemnitz mayor Barbara Ludwig, who told a rally in the city on Saturday that people who repeatedly join protests by far-right extremists “strengthen the right-wing, violent scene”.
The tension that has built up over the past week in Chemnitz reflects the growing polarisation over Germany’s ongoing efforts to come to terms with an influx of more than one million refugees and migrants to the country since 2015.
Authorities said a 22-year-old Iraqi and a 23-year-old Syrian have been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter in the Chemnitz killing
“If their guilt is proven then they will experience the full force of our laws,” said Seibert.
Thousands of people were expected to attend a free, open-air concert in the city yesterday intended to send a signal against hatred and anti-migrant
sentiment.
The concert, which is being promoted under the #WeAreMore hashtag, is part of an effort by German civil society to position itself against the growing far-right movement in parts of Germany.
Former foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel tweeted yesterday that “the far-right terror in Chemnitz is not a Saxon problem, it’s a German one”.
He harshly criticised the political establishment for being too passive when it comes to fighting far-right groups in Germany and asked them to make a stronger showing in places with simmering discontent and anti-migrant sentiment.
“I think it would be good if as many representatives as possible – not only in Chemnitz but everywhere – go to places where we think the citizens are not agreeing with our state,” he said.
But, Gabriel added, there was a clear line between angry citizens and those inciting people with hatred.
“We have to go with toughness after these terrorists,” he said in an interview with Bild Television.
He added that “there won’t be any discussions with people who make the Hitler salute.
“There will only be the rigidity of the state.”
Gabriel called on the domestic intelligence service to start watching the Alternative for Germany, or AfD, party, which was voted into national parliament last year.
In the past, the nationalist AfD has officially distanced itself from radical far-right groups, but over the weekend it joined ranks for the first time with the more radical Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West, or Pegida, and Pro Chemnitz group and marched through the city together with them.
While Germany’s top security official, Horst Seehofer, has said there are no grounds to monitor Alternative for Germany, the state-level intelligence service in the northern city of Bremen said it is putting the party’s youth wing under observation. Hillig’s widow also spoke out for the first time yesterday, saying that, “Daniel would have never wanted” the protests triggered by his killing.
“Daniel was neither left nor right,” the widow, identified only as Bianca T, told daily Bild adding that she was shocked by how the far right was exploiting his death.
“I looked at the events on Saturday night – this was not about Daniel at all.”
“All we want to do right now is mourn him in peace,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here