A CAMPAIGN to prevent the demolition of popular buildings in Leith Walk in Edinburgh has attracted 12,200 signatures, councillors in the City Chambers were told yesterday.
Save Leith Walk was formed to oppose the plan by Drum Property Group to demolish part of the buildings on the main arterial link between Edinburgh and the Port of Leith.
The developer has applied to Edinburgh Council for permission to build a 500-bed student accommodation, 53 affordable homes and a 56-bedroom hotel, as well as a restaurant, cafe and retail units at 106-154 Leith Walk.
The petition was handed in to Edinburgh Council yesterday before the Planning Committee met to discuss policy - it does not consider individual cases or petitions.
Ian Hood told the Planning Committee that campaigners wanted to see a process that enabled the local community to have a say in the future of local buildings.
As part of a deputation to the committee, Hood told councillors: “If a developer wants to demolish a building they can keep coming back time and again until they get the permissions right.
“If for any reason any proposals for demolition anywhere in Edinburgh are refused, then the developer is free to submit a new application the following day.
“Or they can board a building up and leave it to rot until the building wasn’t worth saving,” he added.
“At the moment we have been collecting the signatures on a petition to stop the demolition at 106 to 154 Leith Walk. We have 12,200 signatures on the petition collected week after week, March through to August.
“Similar processes have taken place across Edinburgh in relation to other threats to treasured buildings.
“We feel the policies of the Planning Department do not adequately reflect the wishes of communities in respect to treasured buildings.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel