LABOUR offered to drop disciplinary action against Dame Margaret Hodge in the party’s anti-Semitism dispute, on the condition she issued an “appropriate apology”, it emerged yesterday.
The veteran Labour MP published a three-page letter on her Facebook page, dated July 25 and from the party’s general secretary, Jennie Formby.
Sent to Hodge’s lawyer, it says a “warning and reprimand” from the chief whip would enable the investigation “to be brought to an end, on condition your client gives in short order an appropriate apology for her conduct”. It adds that should the investigation continue, “your client will be provided with further information at the appropriate stage”.
Hodge said: “This is the continuing correspondence with the Labour Party. I’m still no wiser as to what I’m accused of; the nature of complaints received; who the investigating officer is; or what the timeframe for the investigation will be. Is this fair?”. Hodge labelled Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn anti-Semitic and racist in a heated exchange after the party leadership refused to sign up in full to the internationally recognised International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) code of conduct. The secular Jew, who’s relatives died in Auschwitz concentration camp, called for disciplinary investigations against her and colleague Ian Austin to be ended.
She also demanded Mr Corbyn sign up to the code in full, and reports suggest the Labour leader could be gearing up for a climbdown speech on the issue at the Jewish Museum next week.
The investigation is expected to continue as Hodge has not offered any apology as yet, instead criticising the party for failing to outline the accusations against her and continuing to draw attention to alleged anti-Semitic behaviour.
The letter said: “Complaints were received from a number of individuals about your client’s conduct in Parliament on July 17. The party is investigating the circumstances. If the present investigation continues to the interview stage, at that point the substance of the information obtained will be put to your client and she will have a full opportunity to respond. We are currently at the very beginning of the process. Nobody has prejudged the outcome, nor is there any improper motive for the investigation.
“The suggestions in your letter to the contrary are entirely unsubstantiated and it is unacceptable for you to cast doubt on the integrity of Party’s staff or processes by making them. To be clear, the current investigation is not directed to your client raising concerns about anti-Semitism.
“As the chief whip’s letter points out, Labour Party members have a right to raise concerns about anti-Semitism. The party is making considerable efforts to address that issue. Rather, the investigation is concerned with the alleged abusive manner in which your client behaved.”
The letter says there is “no threat” against Hodge but does reference the possibility of suspension.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here