A NEW independence referendum is on the cards – this time among the global community of almost 30 million Sikhs – who are being asked to call for an independent state of Punjab by 2020.
Campaigners claim that Sikhs are the indigenous people of Punjab, a northern Indian state bordering Pakistan, with a distinct religious, cultural and linguistic identity who have been repressed by the Indian state.
They are launching the “London Declaration”, a peaceful campaign for a non-binding referendum on the Sikhs’ right to self-determination, as guaranteed by the UN Charter and International Convention on Civil and Political Rights.
Plans for a referendum in 2020 will be unveiled at a rally in Trafalgar Square next month, organised by campaign group Sikhs For Justice, which will attract Sikhs from the UK, Europe and North America. The group believes Sikhs should be allowed to vote for independence from India because they meet the five-part test for self-determination in the UN Charter: they have an identifiable territory; a history of self-governance in that territory; a distinct culture involving religion, language, social and other characteristics; a will for self-governance and the capacity for it.
More than a dozen US-based Sikh groups formally submitted the case for a plebiscite to the secretary-general of the United Nations last year and the campaign is now being extended worldwide to give Sikhs the chance to vote to create an independent sovereign state of Khalistan.
Sikhs for Justice said that since the UN was created in 1945, dozens of countries have come into existence through a referendum, and high-profile independence campaigns are currently being fought in Scotland, Catalonia and Kurdistan.
It claims Sikhs have also been victims of economic exploitation, with the majority of Punjab’s river water diverted by the Indian government to the Hindu-dominated states of Haryana and Rajastan, causing hardship in Indian Punjab, where most people are dependent on agriculture.
Gurpatwant Pannun, legal adviser to Sikhs for Justice, said: “This is a peaceful, democratic campaign to give Sikhs the right to determine their own future.
“Since announcing our plans, we have been subjected to violent and illegal measures by the Indian state, including trumped-up charges of sedition and illegal detention, designed to silence us.
“We will not be silenced. We are giving Sikhs a voice and the chance to send out a message that will be heard around the world”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel