ABOUT five years ago, Hollywood actress Mary Jane Wells was working on a film by director Nicole Conn when a woman approached her with a film script. “She said there was a part for me,” says Wells, who trained at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland.
Reading the script by Danna Davis (not her real name), a woman who had served in the US Army for ten years, Wells sensed the story was real, not fiction.
“There was a definite sense of catharsis,” Wells says. “This was someone who really needed to tell her story. It was coming out of her like a force.”
When Wells verified the details with US Department of Defence records, Davis’s story checked out.
Back in the “don’t ask, don’t tell” Clinton-era when gay people were barred from military service, Sergeant Davis – a lesbian and the only female in her company – was sexually assaulted by three male soldiers. Plunged into a dangerous mission, she then has to rely on one of her attackers to get her squad home safely.
“She ends up ... having to carry him on her back,” Wells says, audibly drawing breath. “You develop a close-knit bond when you’re deployed. It is very familial. You have to make sure everyone comes home. And she did.”
Previewing at Greenock’s Beacon Arts Centre on July 14, Heroine will then make its world premiere run at the Fringe as part of Made In Scotland, a showcase supported by the Scottish Government’s Edinburgh Festivals Expo Fund. Directed by Susan Worsfold, who helmed last year’s National Theatre of Scotland Fringe hit Eve, Heroine is performed and written by Wells, who says the long development time was a necessity.
“We had to get to know each other very slowly so I could do that, so I could check, so I could legitimately say this was based on a true story,” says Wells. The actor-writer prioritised Davis’s wellbeing throughout the process and says the ex-soldier’s healing is “far more important than any play”.
“I wouldn’t be doing this if it wasn’t helping her to heal,” Wells says. “We couldn’t have any other outcome. When I started, I said: ‘I am worried. I am an actor. You have to have a good therapy team. It’ll be incredibly triggering and it will bring everything up’. She said: ‘I know’.”
Eliminating all potentially identifying details in Davis’s account, Wells found herself “forced into a world I knew nothing about”. She discovered Davis was far from alone. According to Pentagon estimates, female soldiers in the US Army are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed in combat. A recent US Department of Defence report says there is a sexual assault in the US military every 35 minutes. Meanwhile, the UK Ministry of Defence only began recording statistics in 2015.
Back then, Wells and her team were invited by the United Nations to attend a conference on sexual violence in conflict chaired by Angelina Jolie and William Hague. That same week news came through that the UK Government had to pay compensation to the family of Anne-Marie Ellement, a soldier who had taken her own life in 2011 after alleging two male colleagues had raped her.
Last year, the Royal Military Police apologised “unreservedly” to her family, admitted that “aspects of the original investigation were unsatisfactory” and said it was “vital we learn the lessons of these events”.
The case refocused the spotlight on attitudes to women in the military and a lack of faith by army personnel in their own complaints system.
“There’s no independent system of review, so if something happens to you, who you report it to is also your chain of command,” Wells says. “There is a crisis of leadership as there are not enough who say: ‘Not on my watch’ and really mean it."
While the fall-out from the Ellement case may be starting to make positive ripples in the UK, the effects are beginning to be felt in the US of a recent law banning military commanders from reversing jury verdicts in sexual assault and rape cases. This was the so-called “good soldier defence” whereby assault allegations against a soldier with good combat service would not be investigated.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is now trying to pass a bill that would take sexual violence cases out of the military’s hands.
“Gillibrand has an enormous fight on her hands,” Wells says. “That lack of justice for so many people is why ‘survivor’s humour’ is very important. I found it hard to deal with at first, as an actor. But there is, in a weird way, a lot of joy in the play. In the middle of something that’s horrible, there’s got to be some spark of something, a torch in the darkness.”
Heroine marks Wells’s return to the stage after years of acting for film and TV. Flitting between live action and narration, the piece was described at a preview as: “fascinating and gloriously entertaining – even as it bites hard”. Reflecting on ideas of revenge and forgiveness, Heroine also explores what it takes to be courageous.
“I think she speaks to the bravery of speaking out,” Wells adds. “That is a huge burden, a burden that if you aren’t a survivor of sexual violence you don’t really understand, I think.
“It is very frightening and fracturing to speak out. You’re talking about something that threatens your survival and you’re dependent on the reactions of others.”
Wells hopes to tour Heroine to army bases and “everywhere where sexual assault has been normalised so it can be used and leveraged as a way to reject it”, as well as more of a sense of personal peace for Davis and others affected.
Watch the trailer for Heroine at bit.ly/HeroineTrailer2
July 14, Beacon Arts Centre, Greenock, 8pm, £10 and £12. Tel: 01475 723723. www.beaconartscentre.co.uk
Aug 3 to Aug 27, Rainy Hall, Assembly The Mound, Edinburgh, noon, £9 and £11. www.assemblyfestival.com
www.heroinetheplay.com www.madeinscotlandshowcase.com #heroinetheplay #MeToomilitary
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here