Jeez, there's a lot going on, isn't there?
Let's have a look to see which papers have been paying attention, and which papers have been staring out the window all day.
The Scotsman leads with news that the UK Government might lift an immigration cap to allow more doctors into Scotland.
But what really jumps out about today's front paper for me is the bizarre choice to imply that yesterday's protests outside parliament had something to do with the SNP apparently rejecting a deal.
Of course, the real reason that there were protesters outside Holyrood was in reponse to Westminster's shameful power grab.
Very odd.
The Scottish Daily Mail is really trying its hardest to not mention Brexit or the continuing constitutional crisis across the UK.
It's concerning to the see the Mail's "political editor" in a position where he apparently can't cover politics... instead opting for a story about cold calls.
Oh, and more royal family.
The i is as on the ball as ever...
Next up, The Herald leads with the news that Scotland has been the worst hit by bank closures since 2015.
And beyond that we have the Scottish Sun, which has in fact chosen to feature calls for Mundell's resignation on the cover.
Beyond that however, they have led with a story about a 92-year-old woman who tried to go back into her burning flat for her hearing aid.
Also, there appears to be an attempt at a pun involving the Queen and Meghan Markle. SupERfan. I'm not quite sure what the joke is here, other than implying Markle made the queen laugh so hard she ended up in hospital.
Bit of a stretch though.
Meanwhile The Times Scotland also seems to think that the queen having a laugh is FRONT PAGE NEWS. Honestly, what is wrong with this country?
They've chosen to splash on the news that millionaire presenters have been "thrown under the bus" because they'll now need to pay more tax.
Won't somebody think of those poor millionaires?
The Daily Record has gone strong on the Brexit power grab with a style of front cover that seems oddly familiar.
They say imitation is most sincere form of flattery. ;-)
And finally, The National.
We've covered David Mundells' continuing attack on devolution. Read more about that here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here