What have Scotland's papers decided to splash on today?
Troublesome Tories, nationalised railways and more headlines dedicated to that couple getting married at the weekend are the big hitters today.
The i leads with the East Coast Main Line being brought back under public control. For many, this news must have come as a breath of fresh air - something that was always missing from any seats near the bathroom on this line.
There's a wee follow up on Theresa May being told to respect the will of the Scottish Parliament too.
There's also a noticeable lack of chat around the royal wedding, which can't be said for...the Daily Star.
With everything happening, you'd think that the princess-to-be doing a sex scene at some point in her acting career wouldn't be newsworthy let alon worth a front cover splash.
Never let it be said that some papers can't find a misogynistic angle on anything.
Meanwhile, The Times has restricted its Royal Wedding coverage to a wee box at the top and huge photo in the middle. It also includes a handy "spotter's guide" of people to stay away from if you want to keep your sanity intact.
The main lead here however is a follow on from the renationalisation of the East Coast Main Line and a warning that others could follow.
The Scotsman too has led with this story and...there's a little story on the right hand side that might have had something to do with us. More on that in a moment. 😉
The Scottish Daily Mail on the other hand has put on it's very best "Daily Mail" hat and ran with a splash on the Royal Wedding AND a dig at immigrants.
Sarah Vine may have ten questions about the royal wedding, but we have just one: who honestly cares?
Also, potholes.
The Herald have gone with news that the conservatives could face annihilation if they trample over Scotland's devolution settlement - which it seems likely they may do.
This could be a decision that no amount of screaming "no referendum, no surrender" can save them from...
The Daily Record leads with a story of "karate queen" Kelly setting about two men who tried to attack her. Right on.
They have also gone with the story of a Tory MSP caught up in a lobbying scandal which also happened to make...
...our front page! You can read the full story here.
Remember earlier, you saw a wee reference to "union jackery"? Well, that also came from a story that we ran resulting in the Tories putting in a FOI request and complaining about the result. You can read about that here.
That's it for today! Check back tomorrow for the latest headlines.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here