OFFICIALS in Seattle have unanimously approved a tax on large businesses such as Amazon and Starbucks to fund the fight against homelessness after weeks of heated debate.
The city council backed a compromise plan that will charge large businesses about $275 per full-time worker each year, less than the $500 per worker initially proposed. The so-called head tax would raise about $48 million a year to pay for affordable housing and homeless services.
The debate over who should pay to solve a crisis exacerbated by Seattle’s rapid economic growth comes amid rocketing housing prices and rising homelessness.
The Seattle region had the third-highest number of homeless people in the US and saw 169 homeless deaths last year.
Council members who sponsored the initial proposal said $48m dollars a year was not enough to address the city’s urgent housing needs but conceded they could not get the six votes needed for a larger tax and to override a potential veto by the mayor, who favoured a lower rate and faced intense pressure from businesses.
Amazon raised the stakes this month when it halted construction planning on a 17-storey tower near its hometown HQ as it awaited a vote. It also was rethinking filling office space in another leased building. The two office spaces would accommodate about 7000 new Amazon jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here