FORESTRY bosses have dismissed claims that tree-felling and plans for two wind turbines in an Aberdeenshire woodland are endangering what is the largest viable population of Scottish wildcats in existence.
An independent campaign group – Wildcat Haven – said it had identified at least 13 wildcats living in Clashindarroch Forest, which Scottish Wildcat Action (SWA) had previously named as one of its five priority sites for conservation of the species.
Haven said its research had revealed extensive commercial exploitation in the forest, including widespread clear-felling and the planned installation of two large-scale wind farms, both of which threatened “considerable disturbance” to the wildcats which could lead females abandoning, or even eating their kittens.
The group’s Kev Bell, who caught on film a 4ft-long cat dubbed the “Clashindarroch Beast”, asked the Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) to cease their activities more than a year ago.
“We’re appalled by what’s going on,” he said. “The exact area where we filmed the Beast just weeks ago is right now being clear-felled for things like toilet roll and wind farm install-ations, right when wildcats are breeding and raising kittens.
“This is the last viable population of Scottish wildcats left anywhere, and FCS, while publicly claiming to be protecting them, are actively chopping down their home around them.
“It’s a national scandal; we’re at risk of losing our iconic wildcat to these thoughtless actions.”
FCS, which manages the woodland, said it produces high-quality timber used in housing (60%), wood board, woodfuel and pulp (30%) and pallets (6%), but no toilet paper.
All of Forest Enterprise Scotland’s (FES) tree felling and replanting plans and operations were independently certified to international standards of best practice and ensured a balanced structure was maintained.
It said there are proposals for wind arms in the area, but if they progressed they would be subject to “the full environmental impact assessment, public consultation and planning processes”.
“The land management plans shared with Wildcat Haven show indicative areas for wind farm boundaries, but the footprint of individual turbines within that area will be comparatively small,” said the FCS.
“Wildcats can be present in the forest and yet not be in the vicinity of planned felling operations.
“In this case operations were immediately suspended till further checks were carried out (Wildcat Haven did not provide any evidence of a wildcat being present in the area where felling was taking place) and FES decided to return to the area only outwith the breeding season.
“FES has been presented with one piece of footage that purports to show a wildcat. However, Wildcat Haven does not have our permission to install camera traps in Clashindarroch (where extensive surveying is already being carried out by SWA) and, as they have refused to advise us where this footage was taken, the footage is inconclusive.”
A spokesperson for FES added: “We welcome Wildcat Haven’s continued interest in our forest management and for giving us the opportunity to promote and explain the integrated and vital work being done through Scottish Wildcat Action to save Scotland’s wildcats.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel