BARCLAYS chief executive Jes Staley has been fined £642,430 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for his attempt to unmask a whistleblower.
Staley was fined by the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), which concluded that he failed to “act with due skill, care and diligence”.
The regulators are also forcing Barclays to report on how it handles future whistleblowing cases. Senior managers will be required to update the watchdog on their systems and controls every year.
Staley tried to identify the author of a letter sent to Barclays in 2016 which claimed to be from a shareholder of the bank.
The letter contained a number of allegations, some of which related to Staley.
Regulators said that Staley should not have tried to investigate the letter himself because there was a risk he would not be impartial when making a decision on how to respond.
The complaint in the letter was being dealt with by Barclays’ group compliance team.
The regulators said the team should have been left to do their work unimpeded by the chief executive.
The City watchdog said his actions showed “serious errors of judgment”.
Mark Steward, executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: “Given the crucial role of the chief executive, the standard of due skill, care and diligence is more demanding than for other employees.
“Staley breached the standard of care required and expected of a chief executive in a way that risked undermining confidence in Barclays’ whistleblowing procedures.”
The regulators noted that Staley made no personal gain
from his actions, and said he settled at an early stage of their investigation.
His fine represents 10% of his annual income, and the settlement brought down his fine significantly, from a possible sum of £917,800.
Sam Woods, deputy governor for prudential regulation and chief executive of the PRA, said: “Protection for whistleblowers is an essential part of keeping the financial system safe and sound.
“Staley’s behaviour fell well below the standard we require, resulting in today’s fine and public censure.”
On top of the fine from the regulator, Barclays plans to cut Staley’s bonus for 2016 by £500,000.
Chairman John McFarlane called it a “significant” adjustment to the chief executive’s pay, in a year in which he earned a total of £4.2 million.
“The board takes Barclays’ culture and the integrity of its controls extremely seriously.
“The group’s whistleblowing processes are fundamental to ensuring that individuals feel comfortable raising concerns and are encouraged to do so.
“Having considered the findings of the FCA and PRA, the board remains satisfied with its conclusions.”
McFarlane added that he was pleased that the regulatory investigations “are now behind us”.
Staley said he accepted the regulators’ decisions as well as those of the board.
“I have consistently acknowledged that my personal involvement in this matter was inappropriate, and I have apologised for mistakes which I made.”
Barlcays said it continues to provide information and co-operate with US authorities in regards to the whistleblowing incident.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here