ARMED officers will be sent to more incidents from next month, Police Scotland has confirmed.
The force was warned of the dangers of armed police becoming the default on the streets as it said the role of Armed Response Vehicle (ARV) officers would be extended.
Currently these officers respond only to incidents involving firearms or threat to life, or anything they come across on patrol.
The rule was brought in in 2014 after concerns were raised about police carrying weapons on routine duties.
Changes coming into effect on May 7 mean ARV officers can be deployed to incidents where speed of response or vulnerability is an issue, and they are closest to the scene.
Assistant Chief Constable Nelson Telfer said the current deployment model was "inefficient".
He said: "It does not allow these officers to be sent by the control room to anything other than firearms or threat-to-life incidents.
"They already respond to incidents they come across and are sent to other incidents where there's a threat to life but no firearms are involved.
"They are trained in advanced emergency first aid and we have many examples of incidents where these officers have assisted, such as at road crashes or medical emergencies, where they have been able to get to the scene before an ambulance.
"ARV officers will now support colleagues and the public by responding to a wider range of incidents with an emphasis on public protection, vulnerability and speed of response.
"Where appropriate, they will also support local and national campaigns, such as drink driving.
"The deployment of these officers will at all times continue to be overseen by specially-trained police inspectors across Scotland.
"This will ensure that they will also remain available to be deployed to firearms and threat-to-life incidents."
He said in the past the force had "not engaged as well as we could have" regarding armed forces deployment decisions and has learned lessons from this, carrying out extensive engagement.
The force created an extra 99 ARV officers between June 2016 and the following November.
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Liam McArthur said: "With ongoing threats including terrorism, nobody is suggesting Police Scotland shouldn't be capable of responding quickly to such situations.
"But officers and the public they serve are rightly proud of the ability of the police to do their jobs day in, day out without carrying guns.
"There needs to be sensible guidelines in place to ensure that armed officers on our streets do not become the default."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel