THE Home Office is facing fresh anger over the Windrush scandal after “heartbreaking” new cases emerged.
Labour MP David Lammy, a prominent figure in exposing the fiasco, reported that his office had received six further cases before midday yesterday.
In one, a man who arrived as a boy from Jamaica in 1964 was warned he faces removal from the UK despite having official paperwork dating back decades.
Writing on Twitter, Lammy said: “I am disgusted and appalled by the case I have just received. My constituent arrived from Jamaica in 1964 aged six. He has shown me his letter from the Home Office telling him that he will be deported despite having a National Insurance card from 1974 [and] NHS documentation from 1964.”
Lammy posted an image of a “notice of removal” letter which tells the recipient they are a “person with no leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom”.
It adds: “You are specifically considered a person who has been unable to show evidence of lawful entry because you cannot produce the passport on which you claim to have entered the UK.”
Lammy called on Home Secretary Amber Rudd and immigration minister Caroline Nokes to “sort this today”. He added: “Why is my constituent being treated like an illegal immigrant despite providing documentation from 1964? This is an outrageous miscarriage of justice. Grant him his citizenship and passport.”
The MP for Tottenham said he had had six Windrush cases come in and “it is only half past 11”.
Lammy said: “Each case is heartbreaking and an utterly shameful indictment of this government. The scale of this crisis is absolutely unfathomable.”
Controversy erupted after it emerged long-term residents who settled in the UK from the late 1940s to the early 1970s had wrongly been identified as illegal immigrants.
Ministers faced a furious backlash over the treatment of the Windrush generation – named after the first ship that brought them to Britain in 1948.
People who had arrived in the UK before 1973 were automatically granted indefinite leave to remain but the Home Office did not keep a record of those allowed to stay or any documentation confirming their status.
While many of those who arrived have taken British citizenship or have official documents proving their status, others have struggled to source paperwork demonstrating they are lawfully resident.
On Monday Rudd announced an emergency package of measures designed to resolve the crisis.
Under the plans, thousands of people who arrived from the Commonwealth will be offered the chance to obtain British citizenship free of charge without taking language tests.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here