AN enduring memory from my teenage years was hearing for the first time, in documentaries to mark the 20th anniversary of his assassination, some of the speeches of Martin Luther King.
Now, as we mark the 50th anniversary, his words have lost none of their searing power.
Some clips from King’s speeches have become so famous that few people would fail to recognise them. But anyone who has only ever heard short extracts is missing out. To hear these speeches in full is to gain an insight into not only the burning injustice of those times, but also into the power of hope.
King’s speeches often named the proponents of racial injustice and discrimination, but didn’t merely whip up righteous anger toward them. Instead he spoke to his audiences, people who had endured generations of brutality and were enduring it still, with the affirming confidence of someone who knew that such evil would lose, and that a better world would indeed be built.
When I listened to those speeches as a teenager, I cried. When I listen to them today, I still cry. Today’s tears are not only for the injustices of history, but also for the paucity of progress made in the half-century since King spoke.
The United States is still a profoundly troubled society in relation to race and racism. The far right has grown in confidence over recent years, emboldened to see white supremacy given such explicit protection by even a president, but it is absolutely not a new phenomenon. Such hateful attitudes were never defeated, despite the achievements of the civil rights movement, and indeed those who hold them were never far from power.
Although blatant racial discrimination in voting was in theory abolished before King’s murder, few people at the time would have believed the prevalence of voter suppression techniques that would exist today. The disenfranchisement of ex-offenders alone has a hugely disproportionate impact on black people, as the recent case of Crystal Mason underlines. Not even having been told she would lose her right to vote while on probation, she was sentenced to five years in prison by a Texan court for voting in the 2016 presidential election.
Evidence continues to pile up, decade after decade, of racial inequality and discrimination in the wider criminal justice system, with the US sending a far higher proportion of black people than white into the prison system.
And the violence people live with, from racist mass-murder such as the Charleston church shooting to the daily threats that people face across the country highlight, as shown by the Black Lives Matter movement, that the US appears to place very different values on the lives of people from different racial groups.
The wave of hate crime and hateful language directed at immigrants, asylum seekers, Muslims and other groups here at home reminds us that this is by no means a US-only problem.
While King’s legacy is praised by politicians across the spectrum, it’s important to remember that some of those same people would have been his bitter opponents at the time. Because his radical voice was raised not only against racial injustice, but also against poverty, exploitation and war. He sought not only civil rights for black Americans, but an economic Bill of Rights to combat the wider injustice of poverty, and he was prepared to use the same techniques of civil disobedience in that cause. King’s reason for going to Memphis a few days before his death was to support striking workers, at a time when organised labour activism was treated with contempt by many in government. He understood quite clearly the racism that accompanied the exploitation of poor workers, but his response to it was a call for people of all races to unite in the fight against poverty and to create a society free from economic as well as racial injustice. He made the case for a citizens’ income as a foundation for this more equal society, an argument which now, decades later, is starting to gain ground.
Martin Luther King conveyed a passionate belief that not only was a better society needed, not only that it was urgent, but that it was actually coming. That we were capable of building this better society where it was everyone’s business to take on injustice, not only when they were affected themselves but when they saw it imposed against their neighbour too.
As a teenager, his words moved me. But I imagined at the time they were a matter of history. Listen to those words now, and you are listening to something still profoundly relevant; a powerful voice against injustices which burn still in our world today.
We must try, however hard, to remember his belief in our collective ability to rise against these injustices, and to overcome.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here