A DOWNING Street aide is facing calls to resign after allegedly "outing" a whisteblower who claimed the official Brexit campaign broke strict spending rules during the European Union referendum.
Shahmir Sanni claimed at the weekend that Vote Leave used its links with another pro-Brexit group to get round the £7 million spending limit monitored by the Electoral Commission.
He also alleged through his lawyers that he had been "outed" by No 10 over a relationship he had at the time of the referendum with Stephen Parkinson, a senior figure in the Vote Leave campaign who is now Theresa May's political secretary.
Parkinson said he believed it was inevitable that details of their relationship would become known once Sanni decided to go public with his allegations in interviews with Channel 4 News and the Observer.
However, Chris Wylie, the Cambridge Analytica whistleblower who disclosed the Facebook data breach and a friend of Sanni, said Parkinson's actions had put Sanni's family in Pakistan in danger, forcing them to take measures for their own security.
"He was forced to come out to his mum in the middle of the night because No 10 Downing Street decided it was appropriate to out somebody," Wylie told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"He (Parkison) should resign for outing somebody and endangering his family."
Parkinson said at the weekend that he was "saddened" by the "factually incorrect and misleading" statements by Sanni and his lawyers.
He said: "I cannot see how our relationship, which was ongoing at the time of the referendum and which is a material fact in the allegations being made, could have remained private once Shahmir decided to publicise his false claims in this way."
Sanni is set to present further evidence to support his claims at a news conference in London on Monday.
Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson - who played a leading role in Vote Leave - has dismissed as "ludicrous" the allegation that the campaign broke election spending rules.
The claims centre around Vote Leave - the officially designated campaign in the 2016 referendum - and its links to the BeLeave group which it helped fund.
Sanni claimed Vote Leave used BeLeave to get around the strict £7 million spending limits monitored by the Electoral Commission.
Parkinson and Vote Leave have strongly denied wrongdoing and said the £625,000 donated to BeLeave was within the rules which allowed money to go to other, independent, campaigns.
But Sanni told Channel 4 News: "I know that Vote Leave cheated ... I know that people have been lied to and that the referendum wasn't legitimate."
The £625,000 was reportedly given straight to Canadian company AggregateIQ - which is alleged to have links to controversial data firm Cambridge Analytica.
Sanni said: "In effect they used BeLeave to over-spend, and not just by a small amount ... Almost two-thirds of a million pounds makes all the difference and it wasn't legal."
Johnson said the Channel 4 News and Observer stories based on Sanni's testimony were "utterly ludicrous" and Vote Leave "won fair and square - and legally".
Environment Secretary Michael Gove, who was campaign co-chairman for Vote Leave, said the result of the referendum must be respected.
"I respect the motives and understand the feelings of those who voted to remain in the EU," he said.
"But 17.4 million opted to leave in a free and fair vote and the result must be respected. It's our job now to work to overcome division."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel