A WATCHDOG has blasted conditions at Britain’s largest immigration removal centre and the “unacceptable” length of time people are being held there.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons found one foreign national had been detained at Harmondsworth immigration removal centre (IRC) in west London for more than four and a half years.
It said in a report that physical conditions at the centre, which is near Heathrow Airport, had improved but bedbugs were “endemic” and there were infestations of mice in some places. HMIP said there was evidence of an increase in the availability of drugs, including the psychoactive substance known as Spice. Chief inspector of prisons Peter Clarke, who published the report, said vulnerable detainees were not being safeguarded adequately and that mental health needs were often not met.
IRCs are used to house foreign nationals, including overseas offenders and asylum seekers, while their cases are decided upon or before their removal from the UK. Instances where people have been held for months or years have led to calls for a time limit on detention.
Inspectors said planned removals failed to materialise due to late legal challenges or a lack of travel documents, while some detentions were prolonged by Home Office failings.
Harmondsworth is the largest centre of its kind in Europe, holding up to 676 male detainees. At the time of the inspection in October, it had a population of 552. HMIP’s report said: “Some detainees had been held for too long, 23 for more than a year at the start of the inspection. One had been held for more than four and half years.
“Removals failed for a variety of reasons. Some were prolonged by failings of the Home Office and its contractors – the Home Office took over a year to decide one asylum claim.”
Clarke said: “For the third consecutive inspection, we found considerable failings in the areas of safety and respect. Detainees, many identified as vulnerable, were not being adequately safeguarded. Some were held for unacceptably long periods.
“Mental health needs were often not met. Detainees were subject to some disproportionate security restrictions and living conditions were below decent standards.”
A Home Office spokeswoman said: “Pople are detained for the minimum time possible and detention is reviewed on a regular basis. The detainee’s welfare remains of the utmost importance throughout.
“We are pleased that the inspector noted a number of positive areas of work. However, elements of this report make for difficult reading and we are committed to a programme of transformation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here