DONALD Tusk last night poured cold water on Philip Hammond's hopes for a free trade agreement covering the financial sector, warning any post-Brexit deal will not offer the same access for services as for goods.
The European Council president also dismissed UK suggestions that the crunch issue of the Irish border could be put off until a broader settlement on trade relations is reached, insisting that the sequence of negotiations must be "Ireland first".
After Theresa May angrily rejected EU proposals for Northern Ireland effectively to remain in the customs union, Tusk warned that progress in Brexit talks could be put at risk if there was any "backsliding" by the UK on the deal reached between the Prime Minister and Jean-Claude Juncker in December.
Britain has so far failed to bring forward "specific and realistic" alternative proposals to keep the Irish border open without activating the EU's "backstop" option, he said.
The European Council president was speaking in Dublin after talks with Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, who held out hopes for an "evolution" in the UK's position as negotiations on the future relationship get under way.
During a joint appearance in the Irish capital, Varadkar welcomed the EU's assurance that it would approach negotiations "with an open and positive, constructive mind that will allow for a possible evolution of the UK position in the future, allowing ours to evolve as well".
But on the specific points of contention, Tusk gave little ground to the UK position set out in high-profile speeches by May and Hammond in recent days.
In response to the Chancellor's call on Wednesday for a bespoke free trade agreement (FTA) including financial services, Tusk said: "In the FTA we can offer trade in goods with the aim of covering all sectors, subject to zero tariffs and no quantitative restrictions.
"But services are not about tariffs. Services are about common rules, common supervision and common enforcement, to ensure a level playing field, to ensure the integrity of the single market and ultimately also to ensure financial stability.
"This is why we cannot offer the same in services as we can offer in goods. It's also why FTAs don't have detailed rules for financial services.
"We should all be clear that, also when it comes to financial services, life will be different after Brexit."
UK Brexit Secretary David Davis has accused the European Commission of "putting the cart before the horse" over Ireland by setting out detailed plans for regulatory alignment north and south of the border. He insisted that the issue can best be dealt with as part of upcoming talks on the future relationship.
But Tusk said: "We know today that the UK Government rejects a customs and regulatory border down the Irish Sea, the EU single market and the customs union.
"While we must respect this position, we also expect the UK to propose a specific and realistic solution to avoid a hard border.
"As long as the UK doesn't present such a solution, it is very difficult to imagine substantive progress in Brexit negotiations. If in London someone assumes that the negotiations can deal with other issues first before the Irish issue, my response would be: Ireland first.
"We have to be clear that any backsliding on the commitments made so far would create a risk to further progress in Brexit negotiations. This applies also to the question of avoiding a hard border."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel