A ROW has erupted over Labour claims of institutional racism in Police Scotland.
Over the weekend, the party put out a press release claiming figures in the government’s six-month review of the code of practice for stop and search showed that Scotland’s Black and Asian communities were four times more likely to be stopped and searched by police than their white counterparts.
Labour MSP Anas Sarwar said police were making people “feel they are a greater target because of their colour or religion”.
He added: “These figures clearly reveal that people from Scotland’s Black and Asian communities are more likely to be stopped and searched – despite the fact that they are less likely to produce a positive detection and found to be breaking the law.
“We must do more to challenge Scottish exceptionalism and to help build a society free of hate or prejudice.”
The police reacted furiously to the claim, saying the evidence didn’t back up the allegations.
The Scottish Police Federation (SPF) said Sarwar’s statement was a “premeditated insidious attack on the reputations of hard-working police officers purely for political advantage” that could create “disharmony and distrust”.
Susan McVie, the author of the report was forced to intervene to say the data was not “robust enough to support direct comparison between ethnic groups”.
The professor of quantitative criminology at Edinburgh University’s law school added: “Rate of search for Black and Asian people combined is 2.8 per 1000 which compares with 2.7 per 1000 for white people. No difference. Rates for very small ethnic groups have huge confidence intervals and can’t be reliably compared.”
Calum Steele from the SPF called on Sarwar to “withdraw and apologise”.
The Labour MSP is due to ask Nicola Sturgeon about the statistics at First Minister’s Questions today.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here