A DIFFERENTIATED immigration system for Scotland is not a unique idea and there are numerous examples throughout the world of how this can work.
From the cultural differences in Canada – where 20 per cent of the population (7.2 million) has French as their first language – to the 6500 islands and skerries that make up the autonomous Åland Islands in Finland, there are more than 40 differentiated immigration systems in the world.
READ THE MAIN ARTICLE: Scotland depends on immigration – that's why we need a different system
So what are these systems and how do they work?
Canada
Two alternative systems operate within the national framework.
The Quebec Government has excessive responsibility over the immigration selection criteria to respect their “distinct identity”.
Several other provinces can also use their own selection criteria.
Spain
Catalonia has the authority to issue and renew work visas for wage-earners and self-employed workers, while in the Basque Country there are powers to address the issue of seasonal work.
Finland
Greater control has been devolved to the Åland Government by giving them discretionary powers to deny applications for Åland Citizenship for “persuasive reasons” or in granting applications “for special reasons”, given their specific remote rural requirements.
Switzerland
In Switzerland, where they have one of the highest levels of resident immigrants in the world (with almost a quarter of their eight million population born outside the country), there are 26 bespoke systems within their multilingual autonomous cantons.
Australia
There is Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme which offers skilled and working holiday visas which meet the diverse requirements of their seven regions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel