JUST eight per cent of British Transport Police members in Scotland support its merger with Police Scotland, new research shows.
Officers and staff were surveyed for a paper published by the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research (SCCJR) today.
Five per cent of respondents said they were "very supportive" of the change and three per cent were "quite supportive".
In contrast, 72 per cent were "very unsupportive" and 12 per cent were "quite unsupportive", with the remaining ten per cent unsure.
And 66 per cent said they had considered quitting policing altogether as a result of the plan, which the Scottish Government says will deliver a more "efficient and effective" service.
Yesterday it emerged that the April 1 2019 target for the merger will now be missed to allow for further work with the Transport Police Federation on issues including pay and conditions.
Police Scotland said sticking to the deadline would mean "compromising public safety", but Justice Secretary Michael Matheson conceded the postponement is "disappointing".
A revised merger date has not been confirmed.
But the findings of the British Transport Police Leaving Home project, suggest most of those employed in D Division, which covers Scotland, would prefer the integration was called off completely.
Respondents identified "very few advantages" for railway policing and "most saw none", with cited disadvantages including "a loss of seamless border policing, a greater risk of delays and financial costs".
Potential plus-sides included greater career development opportunities, but some said they were "anxious" about their future.
The report states: "In relation to BTP officers and staff, the findings raise serious questions about the failure of Scottish Government to build consensus or secure buy-in from those whose skills and experience are fundamental to successful integration.
"More broadly, the findings suggest that any gains in Scotland are likely to be secured at the expense of railway policing across the UK, and at a significant personal and professional cost to many BTP officers and staff in Scotland.
"These observations are underscored by the fact that many respondents were broadly positive about their current roles and working relationships. In addition to the various strategic and operational objections, it is arguably this sense of unfairness that continues to be damaging in terms of policy legitimacy and helps to explain the strength of negative feeling towards integration."
The survey, taken by more than 180 people, was conducted by Dr Kath Murray of Edinburgh University and Dr Colin Atkinson of the University of the West of Scotland.
Murray said: “We asked how well-informed people felt about the merger and found that eight in ten had received limited or very little information. This lack of certainty, coupled with some respondent’s attachment to their current role and work relationships, helps to explain some of the scepticism and opposition towards integration.
"The findings point towards a clear need for improved communication with BTP officers and staff about how integration will work in practice, and a better understanding of how the merger is affecting people’s professional and personal lives.”
Labour justice spokesperson Daniel Johnson has called the merger "foolish and misguided" and his Tory counterpart Liam Kerr said: "It's an unpopular move that virtually nobody is in favour of, with ideology and dogma seemingly the motive."
However, the Scottish Government says it is "working closely" with the BTP Federation and Matheson stated: "The benefits of a single command structure and improved access to the full range of capabilities of Police Scotland will be delivered for railway policing, providing an enhanced service to both the rail industry and travelling public."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel