THE US House of Representatives has voted to re-open the federal government and pass a $400 billion (£287bn) budget deal.
It overcomes opposition from both liberal Democrats and Tea Party conservatives to endorse enormous spending increases despite looming trillion-dollar deficits.
The 240-186 vote came in the pre-dawn hours, putting to bed a five-and-a-half hour federal freeze – the second such shutdown in three weeks.
The breakdown came largely in the Senate, the upper chamber of congress, when Republican senator Rand Paul of Kentucky went rogue and stalled a vote in protest over his party’s willingness to approve spending increases.
Democrats also experienced divisions, largely on account of liberals upset the measure was not tied to any plans to assist the “Dreamer” immigrants, brought into the country illegally as children.
Most Democrats opposed the measure, following the lead of minority leader Nancy Pelosi, who tried and failed to use the moment to secure a promise for a separate vote on immigration. Up to the final minutes, it was not clear the bill would pass and many Democrats held their votes, allowing the tally to creep slowly and giving no indication which way it might fall.
House speaker Paul Ryan urged congress to avoid a “second needless shutdown in a matter of weeks – entirely needless”.
There was far less drama in the Senate, where the measure sailed through by 71-28. US president Donald Trump has promised to sign the bill into law.
The White House was forced to order the government shutdown shortly after midnight, but leaders moved quickly before federal employees were due back at work, hoping to minimise the disruption. A shutdown essentially cuts the federal workforce in half, with those dubbed non-essential not allowed to work, while military and essential workers remain on the job.
The House vote ensured most employees would report for work as usual. Under federal law, passage of the measure is enough to call off the shutdown; Trump is expected to sign the measure as soon as he receives it. The White House kept its distance from the quarrelling on Capitol Hill – Trump did not tweet on the matter, and advisers did not try to assign blame.
Senate Republicans, however, were clearly irked by the debacle. In his attempt to sway Rand Paul to relent, senator John Cornyn of Texas declared his fellow Republican was “wasting everyone’s time” and prompting a shutdown for “no good reason”. But Paul, the resident contrarian, repelled suggestions to stand aside.
“I didn’t come up here to be part of somebody’s club,” Paul said. “I didn’t come up here to be liked.”
The bill includes huge spending increases sought by Republicans for the Pentagon along with a big boost demanded by Democrats for domestic agencies. Both sides pressed for $89bn (£63bn) for disaster relief, extendin healthcare provisions, and extending a slew of smaller tax breaks.
It also would increase the government’s debt cap, preventing a first-ever default on US obligations.
Meanwhile, Thai police have arrested a Russian national accused of running an online cybercrime marketplace where everything from stolen credit card information to hardware for compromising cash machines could be purchased.
Sergey Medvedev was arrested in Bangkokt on February 2 at the request of US authorities.
The US justice department has announced indictments against 36 people accused of being active in the Infraud Organisation - founded in 2010 and operating under the slogan “In Fraud We Trust”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here