NICOLA Sturgeon has been questioned at Holyrood on the involvement of special advisers in handling freedom of information (FOI) requests.
During First Minister's Questions, Labour's Rhoda Grant said: "The First Minister appears to be aware that her government and their special advisers are holding back material from FOIs that could cause them embarrassment.
"Does she therefore believe that saving their own blushes is more important than transparency, and indeed, the law?"
The First Minister said she had previously been questioned on information based on a FOI request, which she would not have been able to do if "we were withholding it in some way".
She added: "FOI requests are handled by Scottish Government officials, they seek comments from relevant parts of the Scottish Government and consider whether Ministerial clearance should be sought.
"That's entirely appropriate because the legal duty to comply with FOI legislation lies with Scottish Ministers."
She said FOI requests are handled in line with the legislation at all times.
Grant earlier lodged an Urgent Question on the issue but it was not selected.
Her party colleague Neil Findlay later raised a point of order in which he claimed special advisers are "routinely copied into and politically interfering in replies" to FOI emails.
He also claimed Deputy First Minister John Swinney was "caught ordering key documents to be withdrawn".
He asked Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh if he had been informed when an independent review of the Scottish Government's FOI performance, backed by parliament last year, will take place.
Macintosh said Findlay's intervention was not a point of order.
Earlier, the Conservatives called for the parliamentary business minister to answer questions at Holyrood.
Conservative MSP Edward Mountain said Joe Fitzpatrick may have misled parliament when questioned on the issue last summer.
It follows research by lecturer and journalist James McEnaney which suggested that documents were removed from an FOI release at the request of Swinney and his special adviser.
When asked in June whether requests were being screened for potential political damage by special advisers, Fitzpatrick responded: "No, requests are all prepared by Scottish Government officials.
"Special advisers have a role in assessing draft responses for accuracy."
Mountain said: "We now know that the answers given by Mr Fitzpatrick to the Scottish Parliament are not true.
"The evidence suggests that special advisers are routinely involved in the freedom of information process for political purposes and John Swinney himself is suppressing documents when it suits him.
"Mr Fitzpatrick categorically denied this on the floor of the Scottish Parliament.
"Joe Fitzpatrick must return to the Scottish Parliament immediately and explain these responses.
"It appears this may well be a breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct. It is entirely unethical for a Scottish minister to mislead the Scottish Parliament."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel